Woah! And I thought we had it bad here. There has to be a way to set some kind of reasonable barrier for entry
HappyTimeHarry
0 Post – 88 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
Even if she did step down republicans would just hold the replacement until after trump
Peoples lived experiences under Trump turned out to be better than their current ones under Biden, pretty simple. It's all vibes.
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." -George Carlin
"Monero is useless if you have to set up PayPal."
Meaning they already know your identity because of PayPal(or other required kyc), so using xmr doesnt have any benefit at that point.
Gotta love when the article saying adblock-blocking doesn't work is itself preceded by a notice to disable your adblocker
some shady crypto group bought the rights to the name or something like that after the original creator had let their rights to it expire.
I wish someone could explain to me how it is firefox, which is not chromium based but larely dependent on google for funding, has the ability and manpower to maintain not just the manifest v2+all the other stuff, while every single chromium fork has no choice but to use v3. Why can't they just fork the last usable version of chromium and go from there as an independent fork? Is it just that no one wants to?
Like firefox has lots of ports, some of the follow the main branch but then others like waterfox forked off older versions at some point and just kept going, why can't chrome based browsers do a fork like that? How is it there are people making new browsers from scratch like ladybird, but this manifest stuff is just out of reach for everyone, except mozilla (and i guess other firefox forks).
i dont think it works like that, they dont get to leave they just no longer have a home.
How long until they run of of ideas and just ban all women entirely
in my state (OR) you can sign up for an email that says when your ballot was counted but not who you voted for.
Last election my city passed rank choice voting, this election its being voted on state wide and will hopefully pass.
its really not tho. the creator took it off the market because they felt bad about how addictive it was, the only reason this new one exists is to exploit people.
I'm not sure if hes the best choice, I just want to see them trying to come up with insults for an astronaut.
when you turned off your ad blocker
On Linux most distros do not actually ship chrome but chromium which is the open source version of chrome.
It also comes down to how different groups define FOSS. GNU considers even helper programs (like a package manager or firmware installer) to be "bad" for the user because they "encourage" its use so they dont want them included in GNU approved distros like trisqul or guix . this leads to those "freedom respecting" distros not having things like basic WiFi drivers or support for any 3rd party drivers.
To a less extreme degree but similar is a distro like debian, where there is a "non_free" repository available but users can choose not to enable it.
And so GNU sees having the playstore as a bad thing because its gateway to installing other non free software. Its also safe to assume most gnu evangelists probably don't care much for chromium either.
I'm not sure where you got this list from but its disingenuous at best to say that those people are examples of people who won elections under the green party when the 8 out of the first 10 you listed actually ran as democrats and only switched after they either left office or lost in a democrat primary.
Shane Robinson -Ran and elected as a democrat
Henry Bear - Ran and elected as a democrat
Ralph Chapman - Ran and elected as a democrat
Fred Smith - Ran and elected as a Democrat
Matt Ahearn - Ran and elected as a Democrat
Audie Bock - Ran in special election under green, switched to independent (not green) after.
A lot of the other names you've given are for elected positions where party affiliation is not applicable like "water conservation manager for distinct 7" of some middle of nowhere county. Out of this entire list there are only maybe a half dozen valid examples of people that ran under the green party and won against actual opponents for a position that actually has any sort of power.
Ah yes wiping out hundreds of democrat (and some non Democrat) votes in two of the bluest cities in the north west will surely have an impact on the election.
i too am skeptical of sites that use trust pilot, but i have used greenmangaming before, they dont sell stolen keys or do other shady things AFAIK. It's a decent service.
Its not a violation, they're just abusing the DMCA because they know people won't/can't afford to fight them.
He's done NFTs, reason there is no trump coin is likely due to his having DJT on the stock market which basically covers the same grift.
There are a bunch of MAGA themed tokens too just none that go back to trump directly.
I think it would lean more left, seeing as they are, childless (so probably favor birthcontrol, pro-choice) and ladies.
Is there a reason you don't want the files organized? Id suggest using radarr or something else to organize them first.
As an alternative to kodi, jellyfin is great.
Even the source you copied it from actually shows they ran as democrats yet you still used it... I guess what you really stand by is bad faith.
it lets you know they lied about what ashes you got
no they cant because i pasted that thing saying I didnt give them permission back in 2014
Okay technically its your electoral college representative will be casting the vote for trump on behalf of your state.
Then we probably won't hear from any of these yahoos for another 3 years, cause its not like they could use the time productively to advocate for voter reform then, no its only during presidential elections for some reason..hmmm
is there any sort of way to have the chat logs be public and searchable? the worst thing about discord being a walled garden is that all the info on it can only be accessed by a discord client.
of course you arent voting green, you probably dont even vote at all, your agenda is pretty obvious.
look at how youre deflecting this... saying i should fix wikipedia because you "just copy and pasted" then when i show that wasnt true you suggest i make it easier to copy and paste FOR YOU.
heres a suggestion, how about just dont paste blatant lies next time? how about take your list, look how many of them got elected as democrats and dont include them..but thatd be too straight forward and honest for you i bet, better to just blame wikipedia or say "i didn't write the article" so you can keep spreading your garbage.
tdarr uses ffmpeg and handbrake and a few other tools combined into one easier to use web interface
Wikipedia shows it clearly, you're the one who left it out of your post
Unless you need online multiplayer it doesn't make much difference. I have my switch block Nintendo by DNS so its effectively me banning them instead of the other way around but if they did ban me I probably wouldn't notice.
what benefit is there to use the same name? Even if its the same people you gotta figure zero rep is better than negative rep in this case.
Too bad apple users can't just access the site in a web browser /s
You didnt just cut and paste it, Wikipedia clearly says they ran as democrats, you made the choice to omit that part, so you knew from the moment you edited what was pasted that it was misleading and you chose to lie by omission anyway.
I downloaded that 200gb leak from national public data the other day, maybe not the biggest total but certainly the largest single text file ive ever messed with
might as well vote for trump
Oregon
If they found out it goes to a specific server, why not just block the server and maybe isolate the network from the internet? I guess its easier to replace them but what's to say the replacements can't have the same flaw if other precautions aren't in place, like how do you even get to installing cameras on military bases without thoroughly vetting the firmware on them fist?
It wasn't so much confusing as it was over saturated, like not even half the candidates had statements in the voter pamphlet and many didnt respond to questionnaires or anything. City council was even worse, my district had the entire back of the page filled with candidates like 20+ names.
I'm someone that likes to take time and research candidates, I'm all for choice, I'd rather have it than not, but I can certainly see how it turned people off of the idea, perhaps intentionally.