In 2021, YouTube announced that it had invested "hundreds of millions of dollars" to create content management tools, of which Content ID quickly emerged as the platform's go-to solution to detect and remove copyrighted materials.
Content ID was introduced in 2021? Only 3 years ago? I thought it was significantly older.
Dunno if they meant something different or typoed the year.
Citing the username alone should be enough. The email address is explicitly named for this use case only.
There are website services where you both stay online and transfer directly.
There could be direct peer to peer transfer tools that are more robust.
If you want to go through a file transfer/hoster
There's some more, those are the top two in my bookmarks.
You'd do good of encrypting/7z-passwording if you don't want others to see the content, just to make sure not to have to trust the hoster.
will never be a reliable way to truly archive something
I think they're doing a damn fine job archiving something, and in reliable ways too
Bandcamp
But at the point where you actually become a good landlord, it’s more of a public service than something you actually make money on.
Why is that a but? They're still a landlord, right? I really don't get the attempt of separation of the same thing.
I'm confused. Are you saying people shouldn't have to pay for housing? For food? For electricity?
They're providing/enabling the human right. Why do you describe it as if they were making money off of necessity without trade and giving?
I as a Muslim, do not believe in patenting ideas already, because you can’t deny copying ideas. But most Muslims don’t know about this, unless they actively ask this question.
I'm confused. What does that have to do with being a Muslim?
[neither nor] is following the Patent law when it comes to things when it really matters
What do you mean?
If a human right only exists on paper it’s not a right
A right is a right. It doesn't just disappear.
I clicked here like you suggested, but it didn't play on YouTube /s
You gotta separate the concept of a right from fulfilling them.
You can have a human right. But that alone does not answer how it is fulfilled.
The right is not owned. It can't be.
How do you call an individual that rents you a place then?
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/landlord
A person that leases real property; a lessor.
I really don't see the distinction. And while I'm not a native speaker, I've never heard nor think this is a common distinction or understanding.
Landlord is singular. It does not sound like a company or manager.
That's a good goal, but leaves open how it can be implemented.
How does/can dialogue, education, and respect include intolerance? Isn't intolerance inherently disrespectful, uneducated, and non-dialogue?
A coalition of the Green party and two others currently governs the country. The two bigger of those, Green party being one of them, lost a lot of votes, the small one (that's arguably the biggest issue for governing and publicity) didn't.
The green party had a huge success and increase in voters three years ago. But the way it went, the public communication and issues between the three parties, the inflation, and other energy cost increases presumably lead to voters now choosing to vote against them.
The central-right that governed for many years before received most votes. The far right, under institutional observation because of its danger to the constition/opposition to the constitution, had a big increase in voters too. Especially in the eastern states (previously eastern Germany) - traditionally more right-leaning.
Is every landlord the same? Are they all big companies out for profit? Or what?
Court and lawyers has a much higher cost before court than arbitration. That goes for both their customers and themselves.
Dunno about Germany. It had a big move to the right. The second strongest party is now right, passing two other traditional established parties.