Writing in short form where a lengthier reply would work better and when confronted with such a reply some form of "not reading all that" or other thought terminating clichés.

I've found that as arbitrary as it is - the ability to read a lot of information works pretty well as a mark of mental maturity. Also links to Twitter or Tiktok as discussion points. No one over the age of 19 browses TikTok lol.

No, that would require a pre-requisite of having an area of expertise:)

Nvidia can probably just buy France at this point

ISPs are not the government - yes, so they have to actually follow laws. And CAs caught doing what exactly, complying with the regulations of their country?

Oooh I had an Intel Atom Vaio Netbook as my first ever computer I actually owned, given to me as a gift by parents for school. I asked for a gaming laptop, so I was real bamboozled by it.

Somehow though I managed to grief my friends' Minecraft server with /set 0 and enderdragon spawn spam while talking to them on Skype, but it was painful, opening a web page took literal minutes sometimes and my internet wasn't the fastest back then but it wasn't too bad either like 5-10mbps easily. But it wasn't the worst.

That honor goes to an MSI gaming laptop. It was actually really powerful, quad core, 16GB RAM, 8GB VRAM, MSATA SSD and a 1TB HDD that is still alive and in a JBOD setup with mergerfs in my server today serving me shows to watch thru Jellyfin.

In 2014 it was nothing to scoff at, the 880m ran GTA V on almost the highest settings at 1080p and it had tons of storage.

But as a computer it was just fucking terrible, the screen is the dimmest, most TN LCD blue filter shit you've ever seen, it was all I had so I watched things on it, and it just always made me depressed that I was watching beautiful films and shows and playing games through this awful blue filter that had no warmth, everything looked like some movie dementia flashback.

USB port melted itself and made some random parts of the case have an electric surprise for you sometimes, keys popped off if you breathed on em but not like you would want those keycaps to stay on because they were disgusting, speakers sucked in dust and vibrated it inside, making all audio feel like earrape at any volume, headphones jack flew out, touchpad was off to the side because of the dumbass numpad, ethernet port fried entire cables, DVD drive wouldn't read disks, dumbass UEFI firmware locked down to shit, took forever to disable secureboot and the setting would get lost randomly.

About 3 years later, the AC port fried itself and would work like a pair of dodgy earbuds and I had to sit there rotating it like I was finding a radio signal in class, battery was long gone by then so it would shut off at random, which made android app dev I was doing at the time on it somehow even worse of an experience.

Still have many fond memories of my times with it but man did I not miss it at the time.

I replaced it with a 2010 ThinkPad X201 I got for 50 bucks and loved it, I proudly used and abused it and showed it to everyone like it was my first dress with pockets until I eventually blacked out on xanax and procedurally took the entire thing apart and flashed ??? onto the firmware chip and couldn't put it back together ever again.

Mood

I think it's much simpler than that.

Webhard is Web Hard Drives - SK torrenting scene is very different from the west, to simplify from how I understand it (English info seems scarce) basically everyone uses seedboxes or "web hard drives" in SK to download stuff.

While I can't seem to find out anything about what "The Grid system" is, if the whole thing is an online portal or software.

If ISP routers are anything like the west that means they control the DNS servers and the ones on router cannot be changed, and likely it blocks 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8 and so on, as Virgin Media does (along with blocking secure DNS) in the UK for example, which definitely opens up a massive attack vector for an ISP to spin up its own website with a verified cert and malware and have the DNS resolve to that when users try to access it to either download the software needed to access this Grid System or if it's a web portal - the portal itself.

I don't think this included any attacks on the BitTorrent protocol at all, because as others said, it's pretty secure, but another possibility is simply malicious torrents being distributed, which rights holders definitely done before (read decoying part in https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/03/mediadefender/)

What I don't understand is why the TTS key could even delete voices or read past responses from other devices, ideally each device should have its own properly scoped API key that only lets it access the immediately necessary functionality and no more.

No I wouldn't think that about the UK. Tories shifted massively rightwards over the past decade and they are really losing most voters to Reform - a hard right party, so they are simply not hard-right enough for most voters, meanwhile Labour has shifted massively right to occupy the space Cameron-style neocons were in before.

The right win in the long run because if labour wins, the dynamic will be of that between Cameron-esque conservatives under Starmer Labour and hard-right conservatives under Reform/UKIP/whatever Farage party as the two major parties. This is the final form of the overton window shift, on which the UK and US led the world on in 2016.

If anything the lib Dems - if you take their manifesto at face value - are far more progressive than Labour at this point and don't adopt the "managed decline" style of governance.

This is where the UK FPTP system might actually work well, Reform could get as many as 17% of votes, ahead of Tory 15% and become the 2nd largest party, and yet end up with like one parliament seat because they dont end up with a majority in any one county this time around.

The only hope then is that Starmer is just secretly a really good guy who won't say so because the tory media would eviscerate him on culture war shit, that he survives the power struggle of a labour seat supermajority and kicks out the likes of Duffield and Streeting.

No, BAD.

RIAA is evil. AI is good for us plebs while it's still legal for us to own and operate our own local open source LLMs away from the corpos, in the same way the internet is a net good because it's free and open and gives us power to practice communism (information sharing, hacking (classic meaning) and open source).

All regulation will be aimed squarely at destroying that, concentrating power in the hands of the few away from just any old proletariat tom dick and harry.

Corpos will pay any fees and fines as a cost of doing business and acquire all licenses and reach private agreements with publishers out of reach for the common man or small business, all the while passing the cost of all this onto the consumer eventually just to invest in tech that will make the line go up for a few more quarters.

IP law does not benefit you and you will never truly benefit from it.

Don't simp for corpos.

P.S.: Imagine the next LLM, 10-20 years from now is truly groundbreaking and useful, it's a new tool, and without that tool, you're no longer competitive for work, and all of said tool is owned by 1-2 multinational predatory conglomerates jacking up prices, because you have no choice but to pay up to live. It's cyberpunk, just boring and without the implants, price-gouging a necessity just as they do now with housing or insulin.

We need to preserve the power to do this freely, fairly, without profit and without licensing works.

If you hear about a job being in demand, then it's too late to get into it, those news will always only be good for those who are already in the field, by the time you make it through 5 years of uni, you will be competing against hordes of people who did the same in a demand bubble that's bursting or deflating.

Right now cybersecurity seems to be having a soft boom, if you're in it you're good, take it easy and maybe do a cert and diversify skillset, if you're not, don't bother.

Same with data science/ML which I would assume is going to have a large boom soon (or already had? Last I remember anyone talking about it was Cloud™️ Big Data™️ days, far pre-LLM/GenAI craze ATM.)

Zucc got an upgrade?

Then remain ignorant? Your call bud, can't educate you if you don't want to learn.

The intro to Space Oddity is Fmaj7 (easiest best chord) to Em (very easy chord) and with some C and Am. Tab here: https://www.songsterr.com/a/wsa/david-bowie-space-oddity-tab-s365

Strumming pattern is tricky, but it's my favourite thing to casually strum if I'm sad.

Yeah you're not writing the books, you got billionaire think-tanks doing it for you, and so far your statistics don't actually prove the point you're trying to make.

We never measured loneliness in the past 100 yrs in trans and bisexual communities, so we have nothing to compare to, and your single study knows not to make claims about "these days" that you are making here, for all we know it's exactly like i said - its been worse and now its better, even if it's still bad.

Likewise general loneliness studies take into account the increased awareness and openness around mental health and pin it as one of the potential causes as well as the declining purchasing power (a requirement to socialize) and lack of funding for local governments to prop up infrastructure for public spaces as well as a lack of public transport and suburbanization all long before they even touch social media, which is only ever mentioned by MSMs as a scare tactic to clickbait readers, and there's still the fact that a 100 years ago the exact same arguments about loneliness were being made and likewise blamed on progress and technology like the printing press by reactionaries and yes, there was a moral panic about books getting everyone to stop socializing and only read instead.

So it's actually you who personalizes everything, and instead of defending your arguments with logic you Appeal to (somewhat doubtful) authority which doesn't even back up your point, you draw your own conclusions and project them onto the data - a classic misuse of statistics

have a confirmation bias

Yes I do, but so do you, and so far you've yet to present anything actually remotely convincing. I don't have a stake in this personally, I don't use social media and idc about it, it was a mistake to have it, I just like the internet because I can buy drugs with crypto without the fuzz and glowie opportunists itching for kids to beat up

and you like the little tech bubble you live in

Do pray tell what is this "tech bubble"? Are you going to resort to calling me a techbro now just because I know things you don't? You do know where you are right?

Also "bubbles" aren't real, that whole craze about how we were all in echo chambers on the internet was completely manufactured and thoroughly debunked - it's actually the opposite

At this point though if you fall prey to algos that's on you imo. Just don't use algorithmic platforms with a profit incentive ez pz we have foss fediverse clients and instances for a reason. Same as complaining about streaming costs, just pirate that shit.

I left Tumblr because I couldn't patch out the ads with Vanced and I don't tolerate advertising in any way shape or form, thankfully on the internet it can be disabled with Sponsorblock, DeArrow, privacy badger, unlock etc., unlike IRL where the psychic damage is unstoppable.

so it must not be a problem overall if it doesn't affect you personally.

Plenty of things don't affect me personally, the genocide in Gaza, homelessness (though I was close to it), lack of entry level jobs for graduates, COVID, layoffs, medical bills etc. but I believe they are all problems, the mismanagement and exploitation of society by the capitalist class and imperial ambitions make my blood boil.

I strive to cultivate that hate, to anhiliate the state as my civic duty, but I just like to maintain some basic intellectual honesty while I do so, and not fallback to noble savage and greenwashing fallacies of the anprim ecofash reactionary crowd who just are vaguely upset by aesthetics of modernity.

A cassette on one of those small kid stereos, later it was my mom reading me stuff. I don't know if I could listen to music falling asleep but nowadays I have YT videos on and lots of white noise to drown out the crackhead neighbours upstairs.

or has access to a trusted CA's key, as per above.

I don't see why they wouldn't, or couldn't do this if they wanted to if they were also willing to straight up resort to spreading malware, which idk about SK but that's illegal anywhere in the west under very broad laws.

EDIT: They could also do a redirect to a different URL with a valid cert I guess, though I'm sure browsers block that too. Well I'm out of ideas then, I feel bad for cybercriminals these days.

EDIT2: Wait a sec, how does government censorship work then? Like e.g. https://ttrpg.network/post/7634428 How is the government able to MITM this person? The website is HTTPS and they're using a VPN, but presumably locked to the DNS of the ISP. How are they able to block websites at all in this case with anything other than a termination of a connection (i.e. displaying a banner)?

Even without a VPN by your logic if the ISP can't present a foobar.com cert then they couldn't block it via just DNS. How do FBI takedown notices work? Shouldn't all of these throw up SSL errors and "back to safety" prompts?

Thanks for the explainer, but that's not what I meant.

For example: If I, an ISP in Beijing went to BEIJING CERTIFICATE AUTHORITY Co., Ltd. which is on the list, and had my cert issued by them for foobar.com that listed them as the root trust, wouldn't that work? Because the service operating there currently is illegal and I need to take it down, i don't see how or why they could refuse. If they can't do this for ISPs, then certainly law enforcement should be able to force them to comply, I would assume.

If I then went to abuse that cert and spread malware on my fake cloned site, then what are the affected users going to do, call the cops and tell them the illegal seedbox is down?

This is the only way I can see governments being able to display blocked website notices, takedown notices and other MITM insertions demonstrably happening in all sorts of countries without triggering a "back to safety" warning in most browsers.

This has to be possible, because otherwise the observable results don't make any sense.

I'm not necessarily saying they did the attack this way instead of just simply spreading malicious torrents which is far easier, but I don't see why they wouldn't be able to do this.

Then wouldn't it be just one API key to the rabbit backend instead? The researchers are suggesting it's several keys though. Or are you suggesting every device has the same key to Elvenlabs that it sends over to the rabbit backend which passes that through to the request? That's also very silly if they did that.

I'm a bit of a hermit myself.

That seems like the problem and what's creating the perception making you agree with this.

I took a brief glance at the summary page on Wikipedia for the self-help book:

religious groups (Knights of Columbus, B'nai Brith, etc.), labor unions, parent–teacher associations, Federation of Women's Clubs, League of Women Voters, military veterans' organizations, volunteers with Boy Scouts and the Red Cross, and fraternal organizations (Lions Clubs, Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, United States Junior Chamber, Freemasonry, Rotary, Kiwanis, etc.

Honestly wouldn't miss these if I knew what any of them are. They sound like weird cults.

Everett Carll Ladd claimed that Putnam completely ignored existing field studies, most notably the landmark sociological Middletown studies,[8] which during the 1920s raised the same concerns he does today, except the technology being attacked as promoting isolation was radio instead of television and video games

Sounds like he was reasoning backwards.

Other critics questioned Putnam's major finding—that civic participation has been declining. Journalist Nicholas Lemann proposed that rather than declining, civic activity in the US had assumed different forms. While bowling leagues and many other organizations had declined, others like youth soccer leagues had grown.[10]

And was wrong.

In their 2017 book One Nation After Trump, Thomas E. Mann, Norm Ornstein and E. J. Dionne wrote that the decline of social and civic groups that Putnam documented was a factor in the election of Donald Trump as "many rallied to him out of a yearning for forms of community and solidarity that they sense have been lost."

So like I said they yearn for the ethnostate. Solidarity should be based on class through an explicitly Marxist or anarchist lens, not solidarity in how much they love bashing the fairies.

“People who feel on the margins, who don’t always feel included socially, for whatever reason, that those people are more likely to have higher levels of loneliness,”

So it isn't social media or erosion of civic institutions or any of that made up nonsense, it's just the fact that so many people are still bigoted as hell. That figures. I would suggest them the internet because unlike IRL they have block buttons, adblockers etc to cultivate their own better world.

it's also possible for them to encounter more hatred and bigotry online than they used to in real life (albeit with hopefully less dire consequences).

Just block the bigots? Change platforms? It's ez. This is why headphones always in when I'm outside, best block out the riff-raff wondering the streets on my daily walk. I love technology!

I don't think I'm "just measuring" anything. If you want to plug your ears and pretend that I'm not talking about real problems, that's all fine and dandy. Go ahead about your day and enjoy your dating apps, but social media isn't all roses.

You measure more COVID you get more COVID. Then you go "Oh no! It's on the rise!" and the cycle repeats.

Social media is shit because of corporate control. The early internet free from it was really good.

https://www.noemamag.com/social-media-messed-up-our-kids-now-it-is-making-us-ungovernable/

This just references the book and makes a bunch of extrapolations. Being ungovernable sounds really cool actually. Also something about the "kids born after 1995" and "coddling" and "colleges making kids distorted" set off my dogwhistle alarms off so I went to look this "magazine" up and would you know it: it's run by a think tank funded by a NY slumlord billionaire: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berggruen_Institute

Honestly I expected worse but I wouldn't really take them at their word for opining on how girls these days only know Xanax, twerking, be bisexual and hot chip before examining real material factors for why everyone is so stressed (hint: it's housing and everything being fucking expensive and an exploitative scam and has fuck all to do with technology).

I don't think that's the case, because otherwise how did they leak this key that the backend uses, that presumably stayed in the backend, by reverse-engineering the rabbit android application?

I think the devices all just have hardcoded keys to the APIs themselves.

This seems like a rose-tinted glasses view of the past. Sure there were communities for rich white cishet men where they organized around mutual shared values of racism, misogyny, football and queerphobia but for the rest of us it was being shunned and gathering with the few other local shunned people in nasty dungeons.

Thankfully the internet came and solved all that. Now queer people have dating apps which work pretty flawlessly for us, and the space online is endless for us to gather and be ourselves with each other, freely, across all borders.

communities provide you care, support, relief from loneliness, a sense of purpose, etc. etc. etc.

but by and large it's does not exactly scratch the same itches that your grandma's sewing circle or bridge club used to.

I'm sorry you're struggling with loneliness, personally I'm definitely not and I can't say I know anyone who is.

Socializing online is great and the communities there are much more true and real than some IRL circle of Karens and their Christian bleach enema method and their TERF enclaves.

It's also a much more efficient method of meeting people you actually get on with as well, rather than the endless NPCs on Tinder and IRL who only want to consume alcohol, travel and go to the gym. It's crazy that I could be with someone who appreciates all the same things I do, my gf and I are def soulmates.

I find it no small coincidence that loneliness in America skyrocketed

Sounds like we're just measuring mental health awareness, plus the rise in boomers using the web and often exposing people to their alienating rhetoric.

You get the point, you said what I knew you were gonna say because I have a radically different experience.

God I wish conservatives were as persecuted and marginalized as they claim they are

Misery and perpetual exhaustion drives desperation and suppresses political action and participation and capitalism relies on that

Of course he still wouldn't be a real king, it's just simple biology

I have nothing to contribute, but I'm extremely curious as to why someone would need a "download manager"? What's the use case?

I seem to recall most downloader programs just being malware like Orbit downloader etc.

Tobacco lobby go brrrr

Zitron, though, describes him as "a computer scientist class traitor who sided with the management consultancy sect."

Based

Is there fantasy that isn't like this

Enough with the goddamn thinness soon that shit is gonna snap if you breathe on it

Dunking on the right isn't "usa politics", it is a pastime that can be enjoyed by queer ppl and allies worldwide and is relevant in all countries :)

Maybe this lawsuit is founded by this dodgy lawyer group on behalf of a competitor under the table, who is pissed at exactly the fact steam sales are too generous and others cannot compete

Direct result of the bathroom laws and other transphobic policies because it emboldens the most fucked up to act out and think they can get away with it (as they probably will)

So many are living in total wilful ignorance of politics that I don't think anything is going to happen, most people barely even look at the news and if they did they wouldn't understand most of it, nevermind the subtleties and nuance of identifying bias and dogwhistles etc., they just check twitter feeds for their product fandoms so they know when to consume product and when to get excited for the next product.

They are happy being fucked for all their labour value as long as they get that dopamine hit from whatever vapid bullshit is trotted out of some dystopian shithole like SK.

I've decided the best and most feasible thing I can do right now is thoroughly decoupling myself from the corporate consumerism world, I haven't had Netflix (boycotted over Chapelle initially then just stuck with it) in many years now and I just got around to cancelling Prime too, I've deleted all food delivery apps and I pirate all my media and use ublock/sponsor block everywhere, the only thing left to cancel is Spotify, I only ever buy used gadgets like old laptops that'd probably end up in a landfill, some of which I use to host Jellyfin etc.

This is why Discord is poison to our shared pool of knowledge, it's such a black hole for many games and software (especially ironically enough open source projects) in lieu of decent docs.

I've never seen spongebob

If it was a Pixel 2 or a 4a I'm keeping it, that phone was peak modern smartphone before everything went downhill with no rear fingerprint scanner and fixed focus selfie cams

Hey I remember when I got temp sitebanned from db0 for getting too spicy about trans rights in some transphobic .world or shitjustworks thread, as much as I don't like tankies they seem to be correct about this instance also having shit politics in some ways. Yet I'm still here because I'd like to think broadly as leftists we all agree on more things than we disagree on.

How about instead we all chill on the infighting and all touch some grass and stay out of each other's way?

I'm a little confused by the grading here

https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/products/818542-Lush_Body_Spray_Dads_Garden_Lemon_Tree__2019_formulation/

Says it has allergic effects. No shit? It's full of citrus, as it says on the Lush website.

Says it has irritation for eyes potential. No shit? Don't put citrus in your eyes, somehow this isn't an issue for denatured alcohol though, which is toxic on purpose (so as to prevent it's consumption as surrogate alcohol).

Then says it has Fragrance in it, fair enough that is proprietary, could be some shit in there.

The page for it says Allergies & Immunotoxicity is the only high common concern.

Again obviously you can have an allergy to everything so it's a bit redundant, no? A full list of potential allergens would just be a list of everything, no?

If citrus fruits are a potential irritant, then so is ethanol, no?

Lush uses "DRF Alcohol", which they claim is from Beets: https://www.lush.com/uk/en/i/drf-alcohol

"This alcohol is made out of beets in Europe."

So there's a pretty good chance it's an Ethanol with added bitterant, and possibly some small quantity of methanol ala https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/GB/en/product/mm/ex0273

This is commonly used in perfume, you can find this on sale for DIY fragrance makers as well with a quick Google search. The safety data sheet lists quite a few hazards, one of which is irritation and being harmful if swallowed.

And yet,

https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/ingredients/700215-ALCOHOL_DENATURED/

The ingredient page doesn't even list potential irritation as a low risk issue. Idk, I'm not a chemist, but I wouldn't spray perfume into my eyes, not any ethanol for that matter.

Well what about the problematic ingredients in that lush spray, "fragrance", what does it say?

https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/ingredients/702512-FRAGRANCE/

For immuntoxicity, the table just shows a bunch of vague and uncited claims, referencing some mystery "open science literature".

Neither the product nor ingredients pages explicitly link to specific claims from peer reviewed sources such as journals doing literature reviews on the topic or even studies or papers on the subject, nor do they include a mechanistic explanation for the phenomena.

Known human immune system toxicant or allergen

How can it be known if the whole point is that it's unknown and proprietary?

Human immune toxicant or allergen - strong evidence

What evidence? Where is it linked?

One or more human case studies show significant immune or allergenic effects

So is it one, or is it more? Which study? Where?

Then in Data Gaps it says:

"6578 studies in PubMed science library may include information on the toxicity of this chemical"

May? So do they or don't they? Which studies?

I'm not a scientist, but this doesn't scream exactly scientific, you can't just write "Source: science literature" I would've been expelled from uni trying to pull that shit even at first year bachelors' level in an engineering course.

So it seems that this isn't science or even evidence based, cursory Google search seems to suggest this EWG is a dodgy lobbying group that claims to be a non-profit. Where there is lobbying - there's power/money and incentive/goal.

http://www.undueinfluence.com/ewg_complaint.htm

http://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2011/09/28/cleaning-up-the-ewgs-dirty-dozen/

http://www.realclearscience.com/2012/06/22/food_safety_science_vs_green_agenda_247623.html

They also made a film called "Not So Pretty", which urged people to throw away their "toxic" and "harmful" existing beauty products per the ratings, and buy ones that EWG recommends in the app and database they very conveniently provide with direct purchase links for your convenience, where they lay out unsourced unscientific claims about the safety of various products.

It doesn't help that instead of taking donations in a more true non-profit spirit, the use referral links, which they do state to be fair:

When you make a purchase through retailer links on our site, we may earn commission through affiliate programs. All affiliate fees EWG receives support our nonprofit mission.

With all that in mind, I gotta say I have doubts

Take this as you will, but if you ask me, this seems like a simple marketing scheme to prop up certain products and sell them to those who want to do right by the environment and look after their health by creating a fake "certification" of sorts with no basis in or reference to science, from a dodgy lobbying group complete with convenient referral links to buy said products right on the page, no different from recycling symbols on soda bottles, this appears to be more marketing than truth.

EDIT:

Their legal disclaimer reads:

Accuracy. EWG has worked to ensure the accuracy of the information it provides through its products and services, including through EWG’s web, database, e-mail, and mobile application properties. The product ratings, images, conclusions, recommendations, and findings that appear on EWG’s web, database, and mobile application properties, or in e-mail messages, reflect EWG’s research at the time of publication

https://www.ewg.org/legal-disclaimer

So it seems like this is just entirely their research. They don't state how they have "worked to ensure" accuracy of information, just that they did, which is corporate bs speak, and not very advanced at that. The fact it also says this is just "EWG's research" seems to suggest they don't want to explicitly cite evidence either.

And somewhat more damning is that they say they obtain information from "many sources" but once again don't specify it, and don't guarantee any accuracy:

Please be advised that this information frequently relies on data obtained from many sources, and accordingly, EWG cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon.

Yeah seems sketch.

The only people left there actually engaging and not just checking out funny vids on their phone are drones, corpo bootlickers and scammers anyway lol