Little_mouse

"Most consumers want fast food companies to label when sawdust has been added to food - but trust restaurants less when they do."

"But, when I talk to people in general, most seem to not worry because they “have nothing to hide”, and most are only worried about their passwords, banking apps and not much else."

Sounds like they have passwords and banking apps to hide, You should demand their bank account and credit card details to verify that they have made no illicit actions.

If they point out that they have no reason to trust you with that information, that's when you point out that police, government, or corporate groups are made out of people just like yourself. They might have some codes of conduct, or a vetting process, but it just takes one person malicious or careless enough for you to be severely impacted.

Probably until either the nurses stop panicking in my local area or the immunocompromised people in my life die of a preventable illness.

https://aquamodesta.com/

https://www.splashgearusa.com/

Are some options for people who don't want clothing that is skintight and revealing.

I've very occasionally seen brands like this at box stores. But the vast majority of time if you want something that isn't skin tight you have to get shorts designed for men and some sort of sports top with a shirt.

Yes. Baggy clothing isn't optimal for swimming, and trunks will tend to stick awkwardly anyway, but a lot of guys would feel uncomfortable if speedoes were the only option. I know I would.

It's a double standard plain and simple.

It's not that hard to fold sheet metal into three sides. I'm not sure why these are notable in any way at this point.

Of course, "always cheaper" in this case means less money up front, but much, much expensive more down the road than the initial cost.

Of course, the down the road cost isn't usually that visibly connected to the "make it illegal" plan, so conservative governments love it.

Even without going full 'free housing for everyone' utopia, it would be nice if the rent students currently pay to landlords was recoverable when the space is no longer needed. The same way people paying mortgages can just sell their house even before it is fully paid off. We wouldn't need to drastically reshape society in order to allow people to invest in their own futures rather than shovelling most of what they have into a landlord's pocket.

You don't even need to go that far. Water used in concrete is locked in as a structural component. That's why concrete is described as 'setting' instead of just 'drying'.

https://shoptwistedprotein.com/cdn/shop/products/LockingPinBacks_1296x.jpg?v=1592546935

These style of pin backs need to be pulled in order to release the pin. I've used them on my daily bag and work coat for years without issue.

The trouble with 'Slippery Slope' and 'No True Scotsman' is that they themselves are not fallacies. Invoking them without proper justification is the fallacy. The same sort of thing happens all the time with 'Appeal to Authority', you can probably trust a scientific consensus about a subject in which they are all experts, but you probably shouldn't trust an individual expert on a topic for which they are not recognized as an expert.

For an example of Slippery Slope: Fascists will absolutely try to demonize the most available target, and then because they always need an out-group, they continue cutting at what they consider the 'degenerates' of society until they are all that remain. (And then they find some new definition of degenerate)

"No True Scotsman" is valid in that there is at some point by definition after which you are no longer talking about something. "No true vegetarian eats meat" is valid, as this is definitional. "No true member of Vegetarians United eats meat" lacks proper justification, and refers to an organization, not a proper definition. This gets really messy when people conflate what group people are in with what they 'are' or what makes them a good example of a group. Especially when religion is involved.

I got mine about a year ago after a test-drive, I absolutely do not regret it.

Previously I had done a moderate to low amount of biking when I could, but now I commute ~20Km to work and another 20 back most every day in the spring, summer, and fall. I even commute occasionally in the winter when paths have been properly cleared.

I went upper 'mid-range' and ended up spending up spending about $3000 CDN on it, (as a daily commuting vehicle, it's much cheaper than a second car would be.) I researched reputable brands, and I would absolutely not trust a strangely branded discount Li Ion battery from the internet.

You still have to put in a decent amount of work peddling, but the electric motor makes the bike's speed, acceleration, and range much better than it would be normally.

The infrastructure of your area and what you would be doing with it will play a big part in what sort of ebike is right for you. I prioritized distance, speed, and carrying capacity, but I am going about 40 Km a day on it, so other bikes might be better suited to other purposes.

Stars are so very, very far away that they are effectively point-sized spots of light, which can be very easily influenced by random atmospheric disruptions.

Planets are much closer to us, so they appear to be disks with an apperent diameter. Since they appear much larger from our perspective, they are less liable to 'twinkle' due to atmospheric disruptions.

It might be similar to a Motte and Bailey Fallacy. Though that one is more focused on distinct but related definitions than it is for distinct but related situations. Not the exact one that you are looking for, but the related concepts might be a path towards an answer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy

https://ads.nipr.ac.jp/vishop/#/extent (Click 'Antarctic' under 'region selector' on the right).

https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/ (click 'Antarctic' towards the top left.)