Not if they use that money to subsidise American EV's.
Not if they use that money to subsidise American EV's.
Because Trump doesn't want to give any win to the democrats. I wish there was truly more to it. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/republicans-kill-border-bill-sign-trumps-strength-mcconnells-waning-in-rcna137477
And the potential added problem is that once tipping becomes a large part of their salary they will just decrease their salary and say just to get tipped more. I don't believe any outcome in this is a win for gamers or devs.
I don't get it mate, you had me at your first comment because it seemed fairly written. But lose me at the following 2.
Only I think they're already opening factories in Mexico. Which again isn't a terrible situation either.
Fair point.
Some people want to red rid of them, but by far more people want to keep it, 55% for the monarchy vs 24% for a republic
The thing is, that is the short term benefit. The long term effect could be is that we be dependent on the exporting party and they can start charging higher prices. Generally it is not in your favour to be dependent on another party.
Fair enough, do you have some examples you know off to feed my curiosity on this topic? If not I understand if you want to hide the negative feelings in a deep part of your brain.
I am also wondering where that amount comes from. Though I do not think it should be based on profit. A company can also be unprofitable on purpose in a region in order to destroy the competition an gain market share. Then after conquering the market they increase the prices again.
In this case I suppose it also be difficult to quantify the fine. Of course the duration of the anti-competitive behaviour should also be taken into consideration and apples low willingness to better itself. Is there any article explaining the 500m euro?
Ooh no that's a fair point. Some mistrust is definitely justified until proven differently due to the high potential in conflict of interest.
I'm annoyed by the caps but you had me at the first paragraph
Wouldn't it also be able to crack it in the future as long as it's accurate enough? As long as it's able to accurately recognise what key is which it can crack it like the enigma code.
That's a very good point, I never thought about that.
I get your frustration but you can't solve one extreme/problem by another. That just creates different problems. And I believe you're smart enough to realise what problems that would be. But yea, affordability is definitely a problem that needs to be solved. Getting exploited is never good. Sadly that rich people problem is present in more countries, including China. (not talking about the size of the problem, that is a point of argument of course)
Though that is fruit for thought I can not find any information to back op that claim. I did however found articles about them defending remote working. It's a bit too easy to me to throw out claims such as this without backing it up with facts. But if you do have any other examples I would love to read them.