I hope it returns to season 1-3 quality, but if I am being honest i am not very optimistic about it :(

Where I live, I would look what Internet connection speed is available at this address. A very slow connection with no possibility to upgrade can be a pain in the ass imo

Thanks!

Looks like for iOS this is still in beta, so you will need to install "testflight" from the appstore (allows to install beta apps) and then go to https://testflight.apple.com/join/xQfmkJhc on your iphone/ipads browser and accept the invite link. Then you can install mlem, start it and log in (dont forget to type in the address of your instance at the top)

Im a CG artist and for us its „it‘s rendering“

maybe. maybe the topic is more complex than that.

Are cows raped for butter? always? is it the same degree of awfulness if a cow gets 'raped' in a industrial plant or if a cow gets mounted by a bull in a field? is 'rape' even a term that can be used to describe actions that are done to or by animals? Or should it be used for humans only? is it disrespectful to human victims of rape to use the same words to describe something that happened to an animal? Are cows slaughtered for butter? every cow that produced milk that was used to make butter? How many people could the death of a cow benefit before it becomes a morally correct thing to do? What is a cows life worth? Would stopping to breed cows and thus a collapsing overall world-population of cows be something good or something bad? Or is it in between somewhere? Who defines even what is morally correct and what isnt?

Im not trying to be an asshole or anything (i know it seems like it here), but I dont think writing

Cows are raped & slaughtered for butter ~~the more you know!~~

with a slightly condescending undertone on a messageboard thread about popcorn is the smartest way to go about this

What exactly do you think “something useful“ means in this context?

is - in your opinion - artificial insemination equal to rape?

then something here doesnt make sense

explain

The jokes feel in line with the classic series

???

You can adjust the dioptres of the viewfinder with a little scrollwheel next to it, to match your personal eyesight. Farsighted people will then be able to look through the viewfinder without wearing their glasses or contact lenses and see a sharp image. They will see the same sharp image as a person with perfect vision would see looking through it with the dioptre setting at 0. Then the photographer can use the manual focus to take a picture that looks sharp to them (with adjusted dioptre-setting) and it will also be a sharp photo 'to the camera'.

Fucking lemons. I vote for this!