What dictator? Trump was in office already and I don't remember him being a dictator. That's just MSM talking points. He never even said he wanted to be a dictator. He made a joke about the left freaking out about it...and they did.

Wonder why they left the Democrat party?

Other account?

The Dems really messed up imo by not screwing the others out of primaries and debates with Biden. They totally rigged it for Biden and now they don't have much choice but to keep trying to push forward, but they knew what they were getting into. They've known Biden wasn't well for a long time

Of course they did, they're his top 5 allies, lol

If he cared about the country, he would've already stepped aside, but I don't see it happening. They're already trying to excuse his performance saying it was a cold, then saying it was the cold medicine. They're kinda stuck with him now, but it's their fault. They've been lying and covering for him the last 3 years so they might as well keep it goin.

So your idea is basically just lie to the American people some more until Biden wins and then put someone else in charge? Sounds about right

I did use F-Droid, now I use Obtanium. I use Mull Browser as well, but I really like Fulguris Browser better

I've noticed most of the time on Lemmy/Reddit, every time someone says something that doesn't fit the narrative they just say it's a Russian bot. Everything gets tied back to Russia somehow

Trump kept a lot of them out of the country, and you're pretty naive if you think kids aren't getting separated from families or getting killed now. Human a sex trafficking are at an all time high right now. And detention at least kept them from killing and raping our citizens.

Wrong. They didn't offer Republicans everything they wanted. That's just completely false. HR2 was a much better bill at getting the border under control, or even just reinstating the executive actions Trump had in place before Biden took office.

You're just repeating the MSM talking points. Keep drinking the koolaid

Find something that's less than 20 years old. That's such a dumb argument anyway. 99% of the news agencies in America at that time wanted to go to war. Everyone wanted revenge for what had happened.

Look it up. It listed plenty of sources you can look at

Not sure what the downvotes are for, they're just simply stating the facts, lol. It seems like if you post anything that shows a certain side in a negative light, they just downvote it.

See what I mean?

They donated to Democrats as well, but either way, I haven't seen any proof of them controlling the articles or opinions in the paper

I've seen them talk to plenty on both sides with the same result. Not sure where you're getting your info from, but you're obviously not getting everything

Lol, so anyone that has opinions that you don't like aren't welcome here? Okay....

I looked to see if I was welcome here and this is what I found... The Fediverse is a decentralized, federated social network where individuals can connect with others who share similar interests and values. It’s a space where people from all walks of life can come together, share their thoughts, and engage in respectful discussions.

No discrimination or exclusivity

The Fediverse is built on the principles of inclusivity and diversity. There is no central authority controlling the network, and each server (or instance) is run independently by its administrators. This means that each server can set its own rules and guidelines, but there is no overarching policy that discriminates against individuals based on their political beliefs, including Republicans.

Diverse perspectives and communities

The Fediverse is home to a wide range of communities and servers, each with its own unique character and focus. You can find servers dedicated to specific topics, hobbies, or interests, as well as servers that cater to specific political ideologies or beliefs. This diversity allows individuals to connect with like-minded people and engage in discussions that resonate with them.

I looked to see if I was welcome in the fediverse and this is what I found... The Fediverse is a decentralized, federated social network where individuals can connect with others who share similar interests and values. It’s a space where people from all walks of life can come together, share their thoughts, and engage in respectful discussions.

No discrimination or exclusivity

The Fediverse is built on the principles of inclusivity and diversity. There is no central authority controlling the network, and each server (or instance) is run independently by its administrators. This means that each server can set its own rules and guidelines, but there is no overarching policy that discriminates against individuals based on their political beliefs, including Republicans.

Diverse perspectives and communities

The Fediverse is home to a wide range of communities and servers, each with its own unique character and focus. You can find servers dedicated to specific topics, hobbies, or interests, as well as servers that cater to specific political ideologies or beliefs. This diversity allows individuals to connect with like-minded people and engage in discussions that resonate with them.

That wasn't pasted from Media Bias Fact Check. I got it by asking Brave search and it listed several websites, MBFC not being one of them

Ss the atlanta journal-constitution a liberal newspaper

According to the search results, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution is considered to be slightly Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that lightly skew liberal. Additionally, it is rated as High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.

is the new york times a liberal or conservative paper

The New York Times is often perceived as a liberal or progressive newspaper, but its political stance is more complex and nuanced. Here’s a breakdown:

Historical context: The Times was founded as a conservative newspaper in 1851, and it maintained a conservative editorial stance until the early 20th century. However, during the 1960s and 1970s, the paper began to shift towards a more liberal perspective, reflecting the changing values and attitudes of the time.
Editorial board: The New York Times’s editorial board has historically been liberal, but not uniformly so. While it has supported progressive causes, such as women’s suffrage, civil rights, and environmental protection, it has also endorsed conservative candidates and policies on occasion.
Columnists and opinion writers: The Times features a range of opinion writers and columnists, including liberal voices like Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd, and Charles Blow, as well as conservative voices like Bret Stephens and David Brooks. This diversity of opinion reflects the paper’s commitment to presenting a range of perspectives.
Coverage and reporting: The Times is known for its in-depth reporting and investigative journalism, which often focuses on issues like government corruption, corporate malfeasance, and social justice. While this coverage can be seen as liberal-leaning, it is also driven by a commitment to fact-based reporting and a desire to hold those in power accountable.
Subscriber demographics: According to Vox, The New York Times’s subscribers skew “older, richer, whiter, and more liberal” than the general population of the United States. This may contribute to the perception that the paper is liberal, but it’s essential to note that the paper’s editorial stance is not solely determined by its subscriber demographics.

In conclusion, while The New York Times has a liberal bent, it is not a uniformly liberal or conservative paper. Its editorial stance is shaped by a complex interplay of historical context, editorial board perspectives, and the diverse range of voices and opinions presented in its pages. ----Brave Search

They may be owned by Cox Enterprises but "While the newspaper is owned by a private company, its news decisions are made by the journalists in the AJC’s newsroom." https://www.ajc.com/about-us/who-we-are/DT6HW7HAYVFG7N2N6TIIHHTTVE/

is the new york times a liberal or conservative paper

The New York Times is often perceived as a liberal or progressive newspaper, but its political stance is more complex and nuanced. Here’s a breakdown:

Historical context: The Times was founded as a conservative newspaper in 1851, and it maintained a conservative editorial stance until the early 20th century. However, during the 1960s and 1970s, the paper began to shift towards a more liberal perspective, reflecting the changing values and attitudes of the time.
Editorial board: The New York Times’s editorial board has historically been liberal, but not uniformly so. While it has supported progressive causes, such as women’s suffrage, civil rights, and environmental protection, it has also endorsed conservative candidates and policies on occasion.
Columnists and opinion writers: The Times features a range of opinion writers and columnists, including liberal voices like Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd, and Charles Blow, as well as conservative voices like Bret Stephens and David Brooks. This diversity of opinion reflects the paper’s commitment to presenting a range of perspectives.
Coverage and reporting: The Times is known for its in-depth reporting and investigative journalism, which often focuses on issues like government corruption, corporate malfeasance, and social justice. While this coverage can be seen as liberal-leaning, it is also driven by a commitment to fact-based reporting and a desire to hold those in power accountable.
Subscriber demographics: According to Vox, The New York Times’s subscribers skew “older, richer, whiter, and more liberal” than the general population of the United States. This may contribute to the perception that the paper is liberal, but it’s essential to note that the paper’s editorial stance is not solely determined by its subscriber demographics.

In conclusion, while The New York Times has a liberal bent, it is not a uniformly liberal or conservative paper. Its editorial stance is shaped by a complex interplay of historical context, editorial board perspectives, and the diverse range of voices and opinions presented in its pages. ----Brave Search

Garbage article. Trump passed a crime bill President Donald Trump signed the First Step Act into law in 2018, a bipartisan bill aimed at reforming the criminal justice system. The act was a significant step towards addressing the issues of mass incarceration, sentencing reform, and reentry programs.

Key Provisions:

Eliminated the “three strikes” life sentencing provision for some offenses
Expanded judges’ discretion in sentencing for non-violent crimes
Made the sentencing guidelines of the Obama-era Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 retroactive
Required the Attorney General to develop a risk and needs assessment system to assess the recidivism risk and criminogenic needs of federal prisoners
Provided funding for rehabilitative programs to help inmates successfully reenter society

Impact:

The First Step Act has helped to reduce the number of people in federal prison
The act has also expanded access to rehabilitative programs, which has led to a decrease in recidivism rates
The law has provided a second chance for many individuals who were previously incarcerated, allowing them to reintegrate into society and find employment

It's CNN, hardly a right leaning news organization

He was saying that the Dems saying that he said there were fine people in the KKK or that the people coming out of the woods carrying torches swastikas were fine people was a lie..

Strong immigration policies? It took him 3.5 years to do anything about the border after undoing everything Trump had in place. And Republicans were the first ones that came up with a border plan that would actually work called HR2. Dems shut it down.

I'm getting downvoted because it doesn't fit their narrative. I don't care about that though. It's expected

Yep, if it doesn't go with lefts narrative, they just downvote it. Facts, or nothing else matters. What you just posted proves it. I've also noticed that a lot of the comments from the left are very childish, and always made me think that a lot of them are either just the young keyboard warrior type that doesn't have a job, or that their just bots or something. It seems like they have a lot of supporters online, but when's the last time you've seen someone with a Biden bumper sticker, Tshirt, flag, sign in their yard, etc.? I know I never see them

What's the GQP?

If you mean GOP, I don't understand...Georgia's largest newspaper or the New York Times aren't right leaning at all

Hey, look!!! They found a couple people that are voting for Biden

No, he just lies about what he's doing