NullGator

@NullGator@lemmy.ca
0 Post – 21 Comments
Joined 1 years ago

rm the container, then run docker system prune -a. This will remove all unused docker images, containers, networks, volumes, etc.

5 more...

Virustotal can scan APKs afaik

3 more...

If you virtualize unraid, unraid wont have direct drive access - you can get around this by getting an HBA card and forwarding that to the unraid VM. Others have mentioned that proxmox doesn't have docker support, I personally run docker containers within lxc boxes on proxmox. There are solutions to make managing containers easier, like portainer, if you want to go down that route.

5 more...

Gravity falls characters: Mabel, Dipper, Soos, Wendy, etc...

1 more...

There was an antivirus that was caught running a bitcoin miner in the background tbf. If memory serves it was Norton?

1 more...

Yes its possible 👍

Use:

forward-zone:
  forward-addr: 9.9.9.9@853#dns.quad9.net
1 more...

Nice ad lol

1 more...

It does, but skipping requires plex pass which is a paid feature

UNRAID is designed to run off a USB drive, they have recommendations on what USBs to buy on their site, might be worth a gander. You should be able to write all the info on your current USB to the new one without having to reconfigure anything.

I'd bet you can find it on private trackers - myanonamouse has signups semi-frequently iirc?

How is running a container in an LXC worse than in a VM? It's not really, is it? No, not really. Kubernetes could also be built on top of the LXC as well, sure. There are a number of genuine benifits from running docker on top of an LXC, and it doesn't compromise security or come with a significant performance drop (unlike VMs).

That's my current configuration, it works well. Put your storage on a separate network. I use smb shares so my data is password protected, even on that separate network.

Main downside of this is there's more places for failure to occur. If your NAS goes down, there's no storage access for proxmox which may cause service downtime. Alternatively if proxmox goes down, this also causes service downtime. For me this is fine, but something to keep in mind. Ideal solution would be 2 HA clusters for storage and compute, but thats expensive haha.

This is the way.

Handbrake is a frontend to ffmpeg, so that's also an option

Right idea, but I'd suggest getting dell or lenovo mini pcs instead. Saves you a bit of cash and you can get a semi-recent (low tdp) i5 + 8gb ram + whatever ssd the seller will throw you. They run 80ish USD before tax iirc

repo's readme mentions having support for docker...

Probably on IPT private tracker

1 more...

That's a TODO, atm they're names that reflect their role. So my reverse proxy is "roundabout" because it directs traffic internally

Glad to help :)

LXCs let you get all the benifits of VMs with fewer drawbacks, I recommend that approach if you want some extra sandboxing than docker on bare metal provides.

Perhaps you could configure more than unbound service behind a loadbalancer. Each unbound instance is configured to use different upstream dns servers.

Double check if unbound doesn't allow you to randomly hop between dns upstreams first, but the above solution should work if that's unavailable atm.