Apparently there's a bug in an AMD's driver. It was supposed to assign processes based on each core's self reported performance, but because of the bug it was random.
This "self reported performance" is based on evaluation done to the cores in the fab process, by AMD. Meaning, due to imperfections some cores are a bit better than others.
I'm running a 6700XT and weirdly enough it pre-compiled in Linux but not in Windows.
It's really stuttery for a while in Windows, with low GPU usage and erratic frequency, until it normalizes.
I'm getting none of that in Linux, smooth from the start in-game. Only getting some weird fps fluctuation in the start menu.
The band played 2 early albums + their latest one in sequence. Listening to whole albums in one go was great for many reasons.
I remember having some issue like that, but I'm not sure if this was the fix.
Try unchecking "Show desktop notifications when the song changes" on Spotify's settings (right now it's under the Display section).
I don't know if we're discussing semantics. A performance score is attributed, and before the fix their scores were all 166. It doesn't work, as you said. So the consequence is the preferred core being "random", isn't it?
One that is written in C and also has a Python module: https://aubio.org/
Fellow PT-PT ISO user here. And although I use PT-PT in the OS, both my mechanical keyboards' physical layout is DE ISO, which has most special symbols in the same place. (finding DE keyboards is easier)
I've considered switching to UK ISO before. Typing brackets "[] {}" and a semicolon ";" is harder in PT-PT.
Especially the curly brackets {}, which are really awkward to type with my small hands.
My point is, you won't ever try. You'd only use "weak" variables inside the function you're working on.
It's explicit when you absolutely need it to be, when the function is being called and you need to know what arguments to pass and what it'll return
you can easily forget to catch it and handle it properly
Even if I coded the form by hand and that happened, it's on me, not on the programming language.
But I don't, I use a framework which handles all that boilerplate validation for me.
When you say user, you mean a user of a function? In that case PHP would throw a TypeError, and presumably only happens when developing/testing.
If you mean in production, like when submitting a form, an Exception may be thrown. In which case you catch it and return some error message to the user saying the date string is invalid.
I like it in modern PHP, it's balanced. As strict or as loose as you need in each context.
Typed function parameters, function returns and object properties.
But otherwise I can make a DateTime object become a string and vice-versa, for example.
May be a coincidence, but it stopped launching for me too. Worked Monday and Tuesday, yesterday I didn't try to play, today it didn't work.
Tried:
I don't agree with the problem they aim to solve with those goals.
The onboarding process can be made easier for devs new to the project (junior or senior) with decent documentation. Just enough install/build the project in their local machine and understand the gist of the technologies.