Chigüir

Agree. And it is an unnecessary wall to go through for most people. Printing a Menu is really simple.

I think there is no reason to not lie at your resume while you are confident you can do the task. Most jobs out there are pretty BS anyway.

4Chan makes my stomach hurt.

Once you go FOSS, you never go back.

It seems to be that your question is a misinterpretation of past philosophies and theologies. Believing in an afterlife isn't even natural for human beings and you can check that out in the work of anthropologist who trace our ancestry to hunter gatherers. Most of them have a really straightforward relationship with death.

What you mean is the thinkers of civilizations, and that's a topic that Lewis Mumford covered in his book The Myth of the Machine. That thinking in the afterlife and all those tools like spirits and gods were used along history for... Power. You can think of that like proto-science or just trying to make sense of the reality, but to assume that all smart people of the past believed in gods, spirits, "the little people" and the afterlife is to picture a really homogeneous (probably greek or egyptian) past of humanity.

I wouldn't say "What's wrong with us modern people?" since today I find really reasonable to be critical of one's and other beliefs. Not for the sake of destroying it, but in search for better philosophical answers. If you say something exists, you better try to explain what it is and how did you conclude that it exists and, if possible, show some empirical evidence. Today we've got science that is to date our best shot at nailing some comprehension of our material realities, yet, it all exists in a socio-political context, so to assume that something is "scientific" and therefore "real" is to have things mixed.

I suggest you to check the history of philosophy, that work of Mumford that I find it to be a masterpiece in sociology that everyone should know, and if possible, maybe understand how serious thinkers think: some are believers, some are not, but a sure thing is that a conversation about the validity of some positions exists somewhere. Like Spinozas god or Descartes god, how magical thinking works, why we believe what we believe, etc.

I tend to feel this way until I get a good enough feel to say "compañero" hehehe

Found some niche communities with people who do really enjoy sharing some knowledge, artisans and artist. They have a communal spirit that makes my heart go warm.

Fellas, the FOSS team gets +1 c:

That's true. They don't steal personal property, they steal PRIVATE PROPERTY babyyyyy

Actions do really hit harder than words @_@

sheeeeeet

I leave this text here for my people who need some guidance in this "technology bad" thing so you can make more sense of things. Don't worry, is about Social Ecology, not Tech Jesus ehehehehe.

Nice meem tho

ba dum tss

I'm with you in this one. The more I learn about internet privacy, the more I distance both.

Agree, boxing is the best in terms of entertainment + physical conditioning for beginners

You get it.

Is just a way to navigate the corporate landscape. Most of that is bullshit, just a suit, a happy face and some specific knowledge that helps you get an edge and you are done baby. If you've got a portfolio, even better.

I've got so many freelance jobs in my past this way. It is terrible, I agree. But most recruiters only care if the job is done, no matter who does it.