You absolutely did say that the trials killed infants. You only suddenly started mentioning a trial from sixty fucking years ago because I called you out. How does an ancient trial have any bearing on today’s vaccines? Why bother? Why did you say specifically that vaccines were only approved for seniors when they have been approved for babies? What is your motive for spreading confusion?
I’ve been using AnyType as an alternative to Google Docs and Notion, but this one looks great too. Thank you for the rec! We need to make more people aware of these alternatives.
You might not “care for the crumbs,” but with your attitude, that’s all you’re destined to get.
While you’re playing with Google, maybe look up the definition of a double standard. Then maybe search for the statistics on domestic violence. I’ll give you one for free:
“72% of all murder-suicides involve an intimate partner; 94% of the victims of these murder suicides are female.“
Should there be a hotline for both cases? Yes. But your approach is obnoxious when women are more likely to be victims of domestic violence.
You are 100% full of shit. The RSV vaccine has not caused infant deaths. Stop spreading vaccine fear without checking your facts.
[https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-rsv-drug-nirsevimab-clinical-trials-babies-died-649869418399]
A quick google search shows that the RSV vaccine was recently approved for babies. And I know for a fact the RSV vaccine was given to high risk infants last year.
Edit: While I thank you for editing to remove the bullshit about the vaccine killing infants, referencing 2 vaccine deaths from a trial in the 1960s adds nothing to the conversation besides confusion.