I completely see where you're coming from with the idea of including personality disorders because of that "feeling squarely problematic" definition. Drawing on some personal experience, I don't personally view myself as having a clearcut case of Asperger's because 1) it was never severe enough to be a huge problem and 2) it was diagnosed after I was already an adult, by one psychiatrist (out of many).

Saying to someone "I'm considered neurodivergent" makes more sense to me than saying "I might be on the Autism Spectrum, depending on who you ask."

Good insight!

This is good for bitcoin gaming

"They should've just bought a 4090, if they wanted to play the game" type stuff?

• I work with Java, but like messing around in C# and Kotlin
• Definitely Kotlin
• I'm thinking of getting into Rust or Go one day, because they seem cool

Your reaction confuses me. Do you think you can just walk in to any country in the world as you please?

That's an interesting take... The border might be "artificial" in terms of land, but in terms of culture and quality of life I think your opinion is a bit.... extreme. Like, if you had to personally host an economic migrant from a very poor country I don't think your resolve would hold. It's one of those things that sounds nice on paper but really isn't once implemented.

Consider, for example, that countries on opposite ends of the of the political spectrum and economy agree that they must have control over their borders to some extent. Either to keep people in or to keep people out. Do you honestly believe that communism, democracy, or [insert your preferred system here] can work if you allow millions of people who hate it into your country? Your opinion does not seem compatible with a functional society.