I think this is far more common than one would hope. There are many senior developers out there who got their experience in a different time, when test coverage wasn't important in many businesses. Writing test code is hard and it might be that your teammate simply don't know how to do it.
If the tests aren't there at approval time, they will never be there. I think it is perfectly fine to block approval, especially since you all agreed on it.

We have the ättestupa in Sweden - the idea that we pushed the elderly off a cliff when they got old.

Doing the same for the phrase "I didn't say you were stupid" is a common rhetoric exercise.

Yup, it's bullshit. Here's Daniel Ek's response

You could fill the report with loads of sensitive personal information and then report them...

Blue cheese and orange juice! It's such a bad combo it's worth trying.

That is wildly different depending on location and number of guests

That would be a cool username

Is all of internet going to turn into a 24th glyph thing?

The flags are saying X, I, R M in the nautical flag alphabet

No, it's just bad. Still worth testing. Kind of amazing how bad it can be. It can also be a practical joke to add to your bag.

What about curl and wget? Telnet?

Solr is a great search engine. It won't help you with the crawling, but if you manage to get the data into Solr you have a come far.

There is no projectile drop in 5 meters. A point blank with an RPG is possible.

I drove to the Swedish province Värmland (known for fostering quite a few rally drivers). During the drive to get there, I could see how the ETA ticked down a few minutes every hour. While driving in Värmland, it was the opposite. The ETA ticked up, even while speeding a little.

Not growth for economy, but for reaching critical mass in niches.

Why is content collection for generative AI so much worse than for search indexes?