Independence Day: Federal Court Enjoins Biden-Big Tech Collusive “far-reaching and widespread censorship campaign” against Conservatives
legalinsurrection.com
VictoriousStalemate
1 Post – 24 Comments
Joined 1 years ago
Just like they faked the Hunter Biden laptop story
I think the PPP program was a mistake too. But since the government basically forced companies to shut down during the pandemic, it seems fitting it should pay for the damages it caused.
The government did not force student to take out student loans. You took out a loan, you pay it back, not the taxpayers. Also, the student loan program would also mostly benefit the wealthy.
Here’s a nice write up: https://reason.com/2022/08/26/no-ppp-doesnt-justify-bidens-student-loan-bailout/
He never claimed to be an absolutist. He never planned in allowing things like vioent threats, for example.
And he's right about those terms - they are used as slurs to shut down discussion. It's a quick and easy way to belittle someone and trivialize their argument.
Another good SCOTUS ruling.
What about the web designers civil rights? It doesn’t seem right to force someone to perform work that is at odds with their religious beliefs.
While I disagree with the web designer, the same-sex couple is free to find another developer.
They killed RIF and Apollo.
Also, they killed off edgy content like /r/imgoingtohellforthis. And censorship got out of control. Sadly, I expect the same will happen here. But I remain cautiously optimistic.
Wonderful news. Two great legal decisions.
This is why electing Trump was so important. He's just awful, but Hillary's SJC picks would've been a disaster.
Bad example. The cases where businesses could refuse service to a customer were due to religious freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Not liking Trump would not fall under that category. Not sure about the other example though.
In general though, I think this would be fine. As long as this business is not funded or supported by taxpayer money.
Soros has donated literally hundred of millions of dollars to liberal and left wing causes. Some of his donations have been referred to as "dark money". This is not news - it's been well documented.
My point is that he's a left wing guy, so no one in the media cares.
Thank goodness. This action was simply forcing debt from the person who accrued it to somebody else.
Biden using the HEROES act to justify this action was bullshit. And the President can’t just allocate billions of dollars for this - this expenditure needs to go through Congress.
Even former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D–Calif.) once said, "People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. He does not. He can postpone. He can delay. But he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress."
Lol. It's not "judicial overreach" to stop an unconstitutional spending spree by the President. That spending must go through Congress.
Wahhh! The Court is following the Constitution and I don't like it!!!
I think this is the only workable solution.
Lol. It's not "Republican hypocrisy". This action is literally unconstitutional. If Biden wants taxpayers to foot the bill for deadbeats who don't want to pay back their college debt, he needs to get Congress to fund it.
Lol. It's totally cool when the money comes from George Soris though, right?
The Roe ruling was garbage and deserved to be overturned. As another poster mentioned, basing it on the right to privacy was a mistake.
And people seem to forget that the question is not whether you support abortion or not. That’s irrelevant. The question was always whether there was a Constitutional right to abortion.
Trump is such a moron. I really want him to just go away. Just go play golf and eat McDonald's.
But thank God for his SJC picks. I shudder to think who Hillary would've appointed.
This is wonderful news.
LA recently reaffirmed its status as a sanctuary city. And the cities and states along the Southern border are overwhelmed by illegal immigrants. So this is a match made in heaven.
You may think it overused, but it's accurate. Access to education may be a human right (i.e. a person is free to seek out an education), but forcing someone else to pay for it is not.
The Supreme Court is simply following the Constitution, as it should. It's refreshing to see.
Big surprise. When Democrats don't get what they want, they change the rules.
Any politician who supports a court packing scheme should be removed from office.
When FDR (Democrat) tried something similar, his own party was outraged. Luckily his "court packing scheme" never came to be.
What about those who took out loans, paid them back, AND paid $80k+ in extra taxes due to the degree they got?
Fuck those people, right?
If you took out a loan, you pay it back. You. Not the taxpayers.
Lol. Funny that you are being downvoted because you are absolutely correct.
I guess the deadbeats don't care - they just want their free money from the taxpayers.
God, she's such a dolt. Like most Democrats, she thinks the court exists to further their agenda. That's not how it works.
The SC decides whether or not something is Constitutional. The Court is beholden to the Constitution, not any particular political party.
He should propose that those who took out student loans should pay them back. That is what really should happen.
Are you a female Senator from MA?