You're welcome

you can also use GrayJay (discovered it today)

Blocking google would make sense

Yes youtube inner api is a public server, even with a domain name, and there's nothing blocking it, no authentication. Some people say it's against youtube api ToS but they shouldonly apply to their official api. Now in court you are never sure whay they'll do

I couldn't care less about you giving no shit about being a shit person for shitting on voluntary work. You could just have put the constructive criticism. Putting valid reasons doesn't justify throwing in an invalid one

The whole point of the app is to not have to pay a subscription

Would be weird if it was right. The youtube inner api doesn't need an account, it's the one that generates pages when you search on youtube or start video player

It has many good applications, but many places where more an annoyance than a feature

Yes it is true

pixeldroid is okayish

Yes it does feel a bit incomplete

Constructive criticism is different than talking shit. Still a useless debate

Nice strawman btw

May seem stupid, but after 15 min of using it I didn't find how to subscribe to an ical calendar nor how to sync to an existing calendar account, so basically how to use it. Also some things are weird like holidays being available only in one language in multilingual countries or distinctions between birthdays and anniversaries which I am not sure I understand

Black mirror was never a scifi series, rather a warning

While they manage to build the crappiest image generator

Basically patreon for opensource? Or are there some key differences?

Does it support schools microsoft exchange ?

Chad

Why what?

Sad to see people here supporting the same kinds of policies that are diametrically opposed to privacy on the internet.

Parental control softwares are always parents failing to take the time to properly educate themselves and their children to the internet, as well as trust issue towards their children, which is bad parenting since it leads children into lying to them and finding alternatives as well as feeling seen "as a child", bad for teens...

Moreover those softwares are, as I said earlier nearly malwares

Should I ?

Because usually very few people use Linux, especially in public sector. And here it was all of my teachers, not just one

The use of for makes sense.

`k=0; for (i=0; i

Because ios/ipados ui is very bad and unintuitive.

To make it look "clean" and "minimalistic" you actual features are hidden behind hidden menus, you need to use the share menu to do basic file operations that are not share related, and they keep adding more unrelated functions either there in the text selection overlay.

The worse is that when something doesn't work you cannot do anything since it should look good, so if an app starts bugging (which can actually happen a lot), you wan't be able to properly see what's happening maybe you can empty cache in their messed up settings where every new app is a new setting tab..., won't be able to pick default app for opening something, you might as well uninstall other apps to select default banking app. Basically every time there's a problem, you will not have possibility to fix it because it's supposed to be problem less, which it isn't

The google widget search bar is the thing I hate the most on default Android ui, alongside stupid bixby. Like the windows search bar, it doesn't look good, always stays there and isn't actually useful since you can still search with sometimes one click sometimes two. And the results are horribles with filled MSN-like news

You might be true, Though I wanted thought out answers rather than rage bait

Windows 7 is...ugly so I understand. What I was shocked was they nearly all used it, not just a few

K•(1+r)^n

Sure the style isn't new, but you can make it work in new pieces that didn't exist before, you can also merge art styles and combine concepts not blended before. There have been many innovating art kinds from generative ai, like infinitely zooming pieces or beat-synced deformation of faces or working qr code art pieces, mix use of 3d modeling then controlnet to make custom scenes, many things too detailed to be done by a human in a reasonable time.

Yes I thinks this tells much

It's easy to be faster with exponentially less features. Even vscode is lacking behind jetbrains. Most features I need that are not there is quickly finding all usages (actual usages instead of just search by name) as well as intelligent refactoring of all usages in all files and event some comments and it being done automatically if your move or rename a file also. Also setting up a main run button is actually very annoying to do in most languages in vscode (idk if you can even do it in zed?), you eventually have to ude commandlinz for everything. Also the lack of language formatter for all languages...

Yes the random feed filled with ads unrelated post suggestions and limited to three days is the main issue. i use an Instagram mod but they didn't manage yet to replace the main feed with the friend only feed you can get by clicking on the Instagram button

Moving to antipolar stance requires way more proofs than moving from a neutral stance. Moreover some people may be more informed than me and they could be useful

Yeah I was scared they were into proprietary licenses

Generative ai is not only prompting, which shows you don't know. Who are you to decide what is creativity and innovation? Are you Mr Art?

Anyway, it is not ingesting images and photobashing them into a final picture, that's not how it works. It has no memory of training data images, instead it learned to generate images by trying and when similar to a training data image going more in that direction. So it has the ability to create in the same style, but the original images it doesn't have them

Works well combined with revanced

I agree with what @barsoap@lemm.ee said here. My argument is the same than what you've already heard: since it doesn't take the original images, but rather learn from them, it acts as a human who also learns from many different images and it would make no sense to copyright all artists that a human is trained on. Also it's true that a human artist also has his own experience that also influence the art while the neural network only has the art, however, the ai artist will provide this personal experience. So imo you shouldn't consider image generations as plagiarism.

Though, I do agree that having people scraping your art to train a model on it is frustrating, even though it was already the case with people training on your art for their personal experience. In the case of a model it's way more similar to the original art pieces. I haven't made my mind on the ehtics of model training, but generating is not plagiarism in my opinion.

Anyway, my original stance was on generative ai to be used as art and not on it being plagiarism or not. Generative ai brings a say to make full pictures with minimal effort and some people generate hundreds of unoriginal similar images. Imo, since it is easy to have a final image, the artistic effort is elsewhere: the composition, originality of the subjects, mixing of new techniques: regional prompt, lora, controlnet, etc., mixing with other tools : photoshop, blender, animation, etc. You definitely can make art with generative ai, and it takes more time that it looks like. (Look up a video on comfyui, sdnext or invokeai to see example of workflows)

Rstudio works perfectly, it's electron

How does it happen?

Yes I mean he's not defining himself as against free speech but his actions show