I don't dislike all the changes but the removal of the left swipe gesture to access current channel information and pinned message is a huge negative change to me.
I don't dislike all the changes but the removal of the left swipe gesture to access current channel information and pinned message is a huge negative change to me.
Have you tried Moonlight? It's an open source streaming alternative software that you can install on Steam Links, streams using Nvidia's GeForce Experience as the broadcasting part and Moonlight receives it.
No, it's always been behind a paywall. There's one by a different modder that isn't: https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/761
Oh they found him dead, and was there a speedy trial of the entire village in absentia that afternoon? Dark parallels to mass lynching of black people in the Jim Crow south.
You sound like an absolutely exhausting person. If you don't see the point then you can just glance at the post and not open the link. It's not some deep analysis, it's just a quick list for people to glance at for a few seconds. Your contrarian critiques don't even make any sense. You think a game is overrated so...it shouldn't count? And if story mode isn't being played it also shouldn't count? And if mods are being used it also shouldn't count? In summary, you enjoy nothing and believe no one else should enjoy anything either.
Real tl;dr : None of these except a few mission fixes. Everything else is planned for some time in the future. You went too fast even for tl;dr.
Try installing https://moonlight-stream.org/ on the Steam Link. Uses Nvidia's GeForce Experience to stream from your PC; works a lot better in my experience.
It's a bank not a hedge fund. The investors would be the regular people that made deposits- you know, the victims of the fraud. So your knee jerk reaction is "investors bad" without thinking about anything?
In early depictions of Batman, there were times in which he freely killed criminals and times where he was an officially deputized state agent. In contrast, most depictions since at least the late 80s and 90s were much more progressive, with Bruce Wayne being the biggest philanthropist in Gotham, helping to provide low cost housing and healthcare, as well as funding criminal rehabilitation and direct job placement for ex-cons with Wayne Industries. Writers were aware of the other aspects of justice that Batman needed to embody long before it was trendy on the internet to edgily portray Batman as a billionaire who enjoys beating people up for fun.
Yeah, if it has the same base gameplay loop as NMS I already know I won't enjoy it, no matter how many features are built on top of it.
Phones are getting very long and difficult to fit in pockets. Folded up, it's small and still thinner than a wallet.
You have not explained your reasoning at all on how saying they're against Netanyahu speaking in front of the House is subversion of free speech and not just those representatives exercising their own freedom of speech. That is exactly what freedom of speech is, the right for everyone in the US to voice their opinions.
In contrast, there is no right to speak in front of the House, especially not for a foreign politician. The Speaker can invite someone to speak, and if anyone physically interferes with the invitee's speaking or shouts over them, that would be a violation of House procedures, not any infringement on their freedom of speech. They would not have been silenced or punished. They would not have been gagged (physically or otherwise). They would still be able voice their opinions.
Actual examples of speech suppression would be searching and questioning pro-Palestinian journalists at the border, and arrests of peaceful non trespassing protestors.
It's this famous Hong Kong movie scene: https://youtu.be/szPqlLQxSGY?t=1m31s
The audio in the animation is the Mandarin dub, the YouTube video is of the Cantonese original.
You're literally claiming things that are not true. Voicing your opinion against a prospective (as in it hasn't even happened) action by the Speaker of the House is a right afforded to everyone, including representatives. Speaking against something is not perversely somehow suppressing speech. Saying someone is not allowed to speak against something is suppressing of speech.
Makeup, hair dye, Botox.
Well some games now rely on the speeds of SSDs since the newest consoles have them, so that HDD does not in fact work fine anymore.
It looks really good, but I really really wish the cameras were better.
It looks very finished to me, but just lower quality in some places as compared to the graphics. The audio feedback is extremely weak for everything - animations, hits, vocal barks, which makes it all seem to lack weight. The dodge move is so quick and has an insignificant animation and sound that it feels out of place with the rest of the gameplay.
Got it, giving an opinion that someone should not be invited to speak at a specific location is apparently not an expression of free speech, it's suppression of free speech. Just like how if someone comes up to you on the street and starts yelling in your face, it'd be suppression of speech for you to ask them to do that somewhere else.
Or you know, just an older person going "Kids these days". It's a much more likely explanation considering Jodie Foster has been working in Hollywood since she was a child, and people that are actually hard to get with would have gotten soft blacklisted long, especially a non-AAA star.
Official gov ID photo.