MicmosHoefteEdgehat my beloved <3
A random cat-loving, transgender catgirl on the fediverse :3
Github: Link to amycatgirl's github profile
Revolt.chat: amycatgirl#9237
Mastodon: @amycatgirl@kutia.sernik.tech
MicmosHoefteEdgehat my beloved <3
> Goes to linux community
> Tells user to install windows
:/
at least they look good :3
:3 :3 :3
I don't like the capitalization of the letter A
It looks... Wrong for some reason
so cuteeeeeeeeeeee ><
Bottom :3
yesn't
can confirm
Milk-flavoured Ice Cream
enlightened echo user
Edge is good, yeah, but there are way better alternatives out there (privacy speaking). The closest ones being Vivaldi (in terms of features) and Floorp (Firefox fork).
I use Firefox because it came with Ubuntu and because I haven't had any issues with it, but I would've used Vivaldi if it weren't the case.
Because it just works
Woah, is this gnome too?
Thats sick! Good Job!
Mrow~
From wallpaperhub.app
howdy :3
:3
Title. It says [Kde} when it should be [Kde]
i feel called out as well
I am a tomato!
it is
I am a bacon tomato :D
is there a "dont dead, open inside" community on lemmy?
s
anxiety :(
no one wins bc I hug them both at the same time
ÙwÚ
As a web developer, I agree
But ensuring full compatibility with all three major engines (those being gecko, blink and webkit) is unnecessarily hard, as they have their own subset of features
For example: Webkit does not support extending built-in HTML elements using WebComponent, but Gecko and Blink do support this feature. Or Chrome being the only browser that fully supports the View Transitions API. Or webkit's CSS vendor prefixes
The list goes on and on.
You could fix most of these issues by providing polyfills, but that increases the amount of files that you have to load in order to make a feature work on other browsers.
If only there was some sort of standard... Oh wait, there is one, W3C. Idk what they are doing tho.
Fedora Workstation. It's fast and stable.
Everything I use is available either as a Flatpak or a RPM.
omg
P-3 is amazon prime
It's not that they don't work better in conjunction, it's canonical's lack of moderation in the snapcraft store.
This could've avoided day one by adding a manual review process (like what they are temporarily doing right now)
I don't know how flathub handles new package submissions, but I think that they definitely need to have a process similar to what other distros have in place for native packages (heck, even Ubuntu's own repos have a review process)
Yup! I use Feeder as my RSS aggregator of choice
I subscribe to technology news sites and lgbtq+ news sites using it, since it's waaay better than going into each site and finding an article that interests me, opposed to opening feeder and finding my links categorized by site
I feel exhausted
I normally use Thunder as my main client since it's smooth and is pretty customizable.
But I sometimes use Jerboa whenever a feature is missing
The milk kind of milk
As a snap package maintainer i find it weird that there weren't any guardrails in place to avoid situations like this, considering that the main snap consumer are Ubuntu users and Ubuntu is from canonical.
I guess I should've set my expectations a bit lower