Billionaires destroying yours' and your family's only planet. Your response is to get angry at the messenger like a cuck for the billionaire class who don't give a shit if you live or die. Cool and normal response
Billionaires destroying yours' and your family's only planet. Your response is to get angry at the messenger like a cuck for the billionaire class who don't give a shit if you live or die. Cool and normal response
Me, an intellectual, modding a game for the next 36 hours straight...then quitting after 2 days
Hasn't read the article methods but still decided to comment: cOrReLaTiOn dOeSn't eQuAl cAuSaTiOn
https://www.shitrentals.org/review/review-a-shit-rental
Check this out. Power to the people.
Contagion was very accurate for pandemics IMO. They got a lot right.
Tbh I'm here for it. The reboot trilogy is legitimately fantastic and beautifully realised films
I work in biology and the amount of people who work in the field because they hate maths is... considerable. As others have said, the field is almost entirely quantitative and statistics nowadays, so, lol
I personally don't give a shit about whichever store I use for gaming because I have no loyalty to Steam like a lot of the people in this thread. It's just a store and launcher. I wish people would get a grip.
I buy games where it's cheapest, whether that's GoG, Steam or Epic or anywhere else. I use the wishlist functions to make sure I can price compare on sales etc.
I'd just take a new Fallout game by Obsidian with as many years as they'd need
Hey! Henry's come to see us!
Hey can you post proof of this please?
Tang ping homies, tang ping
Oh same here. Great way to put it. Prey is a masterpiece
The CGI looks a bit cheap. I wonder if this is Black Isle/Obsidian inspired or Bethsoft. Nolan strikes me as an OG fan. I hope it's fun. I'm not expecting good, but Fallout has a fun and vicarious vibe that I hope this captures.
I think there are so many new and great ideas in this space but you have to consider how science is funded. Funding bodies and reviewers want incremental research that is safe. This has led to our current situation. Phage therapy has been around for so long but is only in the last 10 years gained creditability and treated as a path to take. Ultimately, antimicrobial resistance is incredibly solvable even at a policy level and definitely across many scientific levels. But it requires more cooperation than farms, pharmacies, hospitals, states and countries can muster.
Oh wow, I love that concept.
You're not wrong, but I can't help myself. Just one more mod...
Genomics makes this answerable though? It's just a matter of whether DNA is preserved or not in fossils. Genomics is more reliable than comparive anatomy. Comparative genomics can accurately place turtles in animal phylogeny. Sorry if I misunderstood your post. Or am I wrong here?
SnapGene
Origin of life matters to a lot of people I think. RNA vs other self-replicating molecules? Moon-based tidal PCR? Cell formation etc.
Holy crap thank you so much !
Maybe we're not talking about the same thing? I was thinking about the diapsid debate, where genetic evidence is overwhelmingly strong in favour for diapsid evolution Mitochondrial DNA evidence: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC24355/ Micro RNA evidence: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21775315/
Tbh a core multi gene ML tree to all other reptiles would prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt, maybe someone's done that already but I haven't been able to find it.
Three robust genetics papers using different sequences and genes, each time place it as a sister group to Archosauria:
248 nuclear genes (187,026 nucleotide sites): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3473239/
1145 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and their variable flanking DNA: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0331
1,113 single-copy coding genes, robustly indicated that turtles are likely to be a sister group of crocodilians and birds: https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.2615
This level of genetic evidence is an overwhelmingly strong signal, regarding relationships and recent common ancestry to extant species. I would say it is undeniably strong. You cannot possibly get evolutionary convergence over this many genetic loci.
The technology already exists mate. Solar and wind are waaaay quicker to spin up than nuclear. It's a lack of political will due to entrenched industry buying out the political parties.
I read that this was to weed out savvy people. People who aren't skeptical of poorly written emails or messages are their target audience. Could be wrong though.