c0mpost

I'm not sure I know what you mean by diagnosing, but it's usually a good idea to use the same distro you're having trouble with.

Thanks, the author has great points of view not only on portraits but also on the art of the game in general. DE really is a Masterpiece!

They are the head of state. They embody the State but hold very little actual political power.

therefore only rats with brown fur

This. You might have to clear up some space before installing pacman-contrib though.

paccache -rk1 once in a while and you're good, maybe even create a hook

I'm so glad to see this again

True. I live in Brazil and I run my car exclusively on ethanol. It's a biofuel made from sugar cane and thus is renewable and has a low carbon footprint.

intrefence

I see what you did there

I just wanted to make sure you know that food poisoning happens even when all microorganisms are already dead. Some bacterial toxins are resistant to high temperatures and can still cause disease even after their source has been killed. That's why cooking something that's been sitting around in warm or room temperature doesn't make it safe to eat, even though it makes of safer than not cooking it.

Good luck opening it without a screwdriver.

I can think of a few other reasons.

I've cut those with knives. Works great.

I don't get it. Can someone espleen it to me?

"Let's find some firewood!"

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Big Josh emanates Brokeback Mountain gay sex in a tent vibes

I thought so as well. Maybe the other side of the protruding sausages were progressively squeezed out by the dough starting from the tip, and it's probably due to the proximity to other rolls in the back, or maybe the center of the oven was much hotter and ended up cooking (and growing) the dough unevenly. That explains why the tip of the sausages looks popped.

I had to borrow money from the bank this year to buy a car. That made me feel too adult and kind of drove me into a crisis.

ah ah ah yeeeah! wow! wow!

John! Good, man.

same here, roughly

I realized why your comment bothered me so much: I am kind of an antinatalist myself, so for me having children is always dooming them in some way, especially nowadays when our civilization is on the brink of collapsing, but I don't judge these people to be more selfish than the usual. People with Li Fraumeni Syndrome have a 50% chance to pass down the mutation to their offspring, it's no certainty, and the article is clearly showing current technology can detect cancer earlier so people can act upon it. You are calling these people, who have cancer or mostly certainly will, selfish, when you don't have the faintest idea of what it means to live in their shoes. If it is selfish or not, that is something for their children to decide, not you. Passing shallow moral judgment on the reproductive decisions of disabled/sick people is very dehumanizing, not to say it's one of the core elements of eugenics ideology. It's not hard to see how your standing would enable a more extreme view arguing that people with Li Fraumeni Syndrome should be sterilized.

You know what is fatal 100% of the time? Living at all.

Reproduction is not about logic anyway, it's just a very common and fundamental feature of life. People who are disabled or fatally ill also have ordinary dreams, desires and human rights. Framing the issue as "these people are dooming their progeny" makes it seem like their own lives are worthless because they will die young, as if the value of human life rested on longevity. It's quite frivolous to assume we can understand the desire to have kids of people with such diagnoses.

now my brain has melted