Yeah YouTube really likes to inject videos you wouldn't normally watch into your algorithm. It's pretty annoying. I would never seek out religious videos, and never have on YouTube, yet they keep making their way into my feed. Even voting them down doesn't seem to change the frequency.
Rosey
To more evenly distribute the collected rainfall rather than to water just the plants sitting under the edge of each solar row? Or to use the rainfall for other farmy things?
for a price
Coincidentally, the price of advertisements
You are viewing this from an unkown (mobile?) client 🤔
I bet that's one gouda grilled cheese
According to my German FIL, it could also be "Mäusespeck", mouse bacon.
👋
Gotta do your scrotal exercises often. Keeps things nice and tight
Ms Ransome testified that her unnamed friend
This is the part, the loophole, where the allegations will fall apart with them.
Those are exactly the number of ways.
100% agree.
Exactly correct
Instead they could get 5$ a month from me for no ads.
They do this already. It's called YouTube Premium and they've determined it's worth more than $5 a month. My guess is the amount they decide to charge is not an arbitrary number, but one that covers their expenses based on expected engagement.
Unpopular opinion: If people either paid monthly, or they didn't run pihole, blockers, or vanced, the monthly price of YT Premium would probably be closer to your magical $5 cost. Although, honestly, I doubt you'd pay the $5 either.
Anti-monopoly? Unless a person owned every corporation that owned every rental property, anti monopoly laws wouldn't apply.
So then the person creates an LLC and now the LLC owns the properties. Do you then think corporations shouldn't be able to own more than 3 properties, too?
And then should we limit how many corporations a person can operate?
I mean, we are where we're at. So, unless you can prove otherwise...
Aka tranq. The effects can be seen by looking up videos of Kensington PA. It seems to have really taken a hold of that area. NSFL