What if it was instead: "Take a shit"

I think we can agree that Nazi's are not something we want to assocuate with. Help me understand, what would you do? How would you limit the service to prioritize[s] privacy in order to protect human rights defenders, journalists, and everyday users who value their privacy but then also filter out Nazi's? How would this be different from TOR?

Second this! Also a fantastic resource is https://standardebooks.org/ They take public domain books and reformat them for ereading for free! You can download them in kobo specific formatting and it looks so good! Edit: auto correct and more details

"Made up of" -> the non profit consists of software that must be free and open source..?

This is the response I wanted to see but since people seem to hate watching videos (from creators they don't know), iirc the tldw; balancing bulbs coming to full power immediately (as opposed to gradual warm up) and brightness with life span. The 100 year light bulb is cool, but not ideal for actually lighting a room

If she's arguing for ... crap then she should probably stick to Science.

tldr/w: I probably should've only doe this bit here and on her being a physicist versus a science communicator

Humorously enough, she also has a video for that Basically she talks about:

• Why "doing your own research" should be poked at

* Topics she doesn't have a PhD in and has been told she shouldn't talk about

* On being a physicist versus a science communicator

• Main video points
  1. When not to do your own research (When there isn't enough research) 2.(?) Reasonable expectations (Why she doesn't talk about UFO's, a plug for support to do a video on 'Experts', limits of Google/internet, what is relevant for understanding? )
  2. Be honest with yourself (Acknowledge what you dont understand, erroneous mental short cut example)

4. Acknowledge biases

Rest of video not as relevant to your point

Do your own research. But do it right. [Video] Now where's that bot at..?