This is great:
What if my experimental protocol is approaching the 3 month removal period but I am missing ACKs due to reviewer inactivity?
Contributors engaging in good faith protocol development should not be penalized due to reviewer inactivity. It is advised that experimental protocol authors post memes to the base MR until reviewers become active.
What if an experimental protocol author posts memes to the MR for many months rather than furthering development?
It is expected that protocol authors are seriously attempting to reach staging/ status. If it is determined by members that this is not the case for a given experimental protocol after a three month period has elapsed, the one week removal notice may be invoked regardless of how good the memes may be.
You're posting this brief message a lot, so I googled it, and, no releases since October 2022? Only on f droid and is there really no way to pay other than PayPal donations? Am I looking at the right neo launcher?
Development isn't dead, but the lack of releases and fees (one time purchase, please) don't give me confidence.
You can still torrent without forwarding a port, for example by only making outgoing connections. But that may limit your speed, and figuring out forwarding should help.
It was posted from mastodon. That's also why it sounds like a completely random tweet and doesn't fit in with lent Lemmy.
Of all those, I've only heard of Heztner. Am I out of touch?
I've been a Linode customer for years, and I used to use Digital Ocean as well. I've been happy with them, did you consider them?
Handbrake uses avx512 and zen5 significantly improved on avx512
Not true, Arch and Ubuntu (the ones I personally checked on) already pushed patches that disabled cups browsed by default, removing the service listening on 631.
Yes. 2019 comment from cloudflare: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828702
On my network, I send dns requests for only the archive domains to a DNS server that archive likes. Adguards, in this case. Everything else goes to cloudflare. Both adguardhome and unbound can do that.
I was happy with my cyber powers for years, but then the batteries died (official replacement batteries, after 3 years - the originals lasted 5) and the ups just stopped even passing power through. This is someone's old blog about this https://blog.networkprofile.org/cyberpower-ups-avoid/
You probably don't need a local Firewall
If the computer never leaves the house, maybe. If it's ever on public Wi-Fi though, default deny inbound at a bare minimum. Linux computers with cups installed and running but no firewall were revealed yesterday to be vulnerable to RCE.
I wouldn't recommend watching it,
So why are you giving him views by prominently linking it? It looks like you're just bringing the rage bait here.
The recent webp vulnerability is a bit concerning.
I might get the 8 next week. It's supposed to be a little smaller.
What hardware? And can you narrow down when during updates?
I had this problem on Arch on a 5 year old Lenovo laptop with an Nvidia 1660ti GPU. With judicious use of set -x
I narrowed it down to systemd daemon-reload
.
I actually changed my ext4 journal mode and added a pacman hook in that calls sync
before any systemd hooks ran, after the second time half of the package updates got lost due to the freeze.
Because the problem only happened most times, and usually not soon after a reboot, I can't prove it, but the problem hasn't reoccurred since I switched the Nvidia driver to the open flavor.
None that article, but check my other reply and check your plan. You may be pleased, I was.
The marketing fluff doesn't, but they actually did increase upload speeds. Mine went from 10 to 20 up. And here is the DSL reports forum thread from when this round started.
Also, they are testing larger increases. I could get 100 up today, if I had a supported modem.
So, check your actual plan and modem to see what you have now.
Ping is not a good way to test http, because they are completely different protocols, and can be blocked separately or not. From what you have posted so far, I don't see a problem being demonstrated. Your caddy log here also shows one successful request. So: define "not working" better. Are you testing from a browser? Via curl? From where? To exactly what urls? What message do you get back from your browser/curl?
But who is running the bitwarden server? Bitwarden the private company.
I self host vault warden, but it's really not something everyone can do.