jyoskykid

@jyoskykid@sh.itjust.works
0 Post – 9 Comments
Joined 12 months ago

UI is always the main focus for the user. Because it's the "User Interface".

Searching the web for screenshots is an added hassle and something that makes me avoid most FOSS software, because sometimes there's not enough screenshots and not even the developer cared to show what the app is about.

Just convert it with FFmpeg

3 more...

I thought maybe you thought that WAV was purer than FLAC

1 more...

It is general knowledge that these companies do this. FSF has campaigned a lot against DRM, under the name Defective by Design.

When someone makes a contract with the devil and complains when it affects them, pointing it out is not victim blaming.

Soundcloud is one! Some artists let you download their music and others don't. Other than than Soundcloud isn't open source, I don't see what's wrong with them.

Well if that's the case, Fediverse was dead on arrival. But that is not the case. If you use a close sourced client and sign up to a server with bad practices, you cannot use that as an example for the whole Fediverse.

1 more...

I understand that's possible, however it is not possible for a company to take away users who care about ethics from the fediverse. And only those people matter, as we are not going for profit. Others can join in if they understand the need to join in.

Israel's existence is based on the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Palestine does not care about killing Zionists as much as taking back their land. There's nothing preventing the Zionists to own the land in Palestine legally, other than that they'll have to give up the privilege of what they stole. Many residents in the country even have dual citizenship so they can go back to their homelands if they can't afford to pay fairly.

It's is not a propaganda, it is just what copyright law is. Unless people waiver their rights specifically, purchased music is always licensed to you.

Meaning you cannot share the file to anyone else, because if that was the case anyone could buy it and share it with anyone else, making the concept of purchases void.

The only fair alternative would be to make the music a one time purchase of Price per user * Number of Expected users so that the artist gets their fair money and people can buy it by pooling money.

That is stupid, but that's how copyright is.