well shoot. this sums it up so well, there's nothing to add.
well shoot. this sums it up so well, there's nothing to add.
It's not that they might do something better.
It's that they have a history of encouraging the competition to adopt an open standard (to gain the active users), and then purposely scuttling the standard in order to sink the competition (and leave the users with no functioning alternative).
this is the primary (official) reason why most banking apps require an unrooted device, and check that the bootloader hasn't been tampered with. they don't really care what you do with your phone, but a custom ROM doesn't have to comply with the usual official checks and balances, and so theoretically could be malicious.
the bank "trusts" the official OEM rom, because the OEM rom belongs to a company that can be "controlled". ie. pressured into ensuring apps are safe, etc.
the bank doesn't trust the open source rom, because it isn't "owned" by an entity that can be controlled.
a reason lots of companies don't like open source, is because"who do you sue when something goes wrong?". closed source isn't any safer, but at least you know who to sue when it breaks.
this was an excellent article. I'm old enough to remember being impacted by these events.
I'm not in Munich, but I remember trying to embrace OpenOffice, and telling my wife how pissed off I was that Microsoft wasn't following it's own open source document standard.
I remember Google killing XMPP, and there's also the more recent examples of what Facebook has done to WhatApp, Instagram, and the other potential competitors that got buried.
lol, that's how rules get made
The definition of "reasonable ads" and "just a few ads" keeps sliding. I'm old enough to remember the early internet, and that this lie has been told many times.
Just a few acceptable ads always becomes many unacceptable ads, because money.
also depends on the religion.
It is not an attack to simply express disagreement, and not everyone who disagrees is coming from a place of hostility.
The whole point of a forum is for healthy dialogue. You can't just go around accusing everyone who disagrees with you as being abusive and disingenuous.
I've heard a phrase for that: "happy effin Monday" ;)
hol' up, comparing their reading comprehension to that of a carrot is an unfair insult to the average carrot.
and how exactly is the comparison? is it one carrot per person, or can a single carrot out-comprehend the whole lot?
By this logic, it only takes one bad apple to spoil the name of a group, but that bad apple isn't necessarily representative of or indicative of the whole group.
sure, we could argue about who's bad apples are more rotten, but what's the point? humans are fallen and imperfect, so it's no surprise that groups of humans are also imperfect.
I guess the next question to ask, is the group defined by the actions of it's bad apples, or by the principles it claims to stand for?
your first hurdle is installing a lemmy server locally. this is a mission on it's own, and I can be of zero assistance here.
your second hurdle is enabling port forwarding and making that server accessible from the internet. I'm going to assume you know how to do the 2nd. port foward dot com if you don't.
your third hurdle will be setting up dynamic dns. again, lots of choices here, and different tiers of service/support. I'm assuming this is enough to point you in the right direction, and your home router likely has built in support for a few providers.
I recommend tackling these hurdles in order, but they don't have to be done in order.
how much bad behavior do you want to see before accepting that MetaZuck is evil and has no go intentions?
There's a literal trail of dead startups and bodies.