madkarlsson

I loathe tomatoes on burgers and will throw it in your face if you serve it to me.

Absolutely pointless taste wise and all that water is what makes the bread and patty move around with no respect for each other.

Echoing bermuda@beehaw.org. "Degenerates"? You mean a games series that pushed the boundaries when it was new, truly pushed what open world meant, and that it could be done with large, crowded cities technically as well. Sure if you play them nowadays the might not brush any strokes and feel flat but the GTA series has been defining a game for generations where "everybody" in that generation had played and been fond of. 1-2-3, San Andreas, and vice city and the ilks. There wasnt really any competitors to that when they were released.

I'm going to guess you are right that it won't be too innovative. Story wise they have never been innovative, nor pretended to be. They have pushed the boundaries of open world in both engineering and social commentary/satire.

But calling several generations of gamers who grew up with this "degenerates". Hard to take you seriously and your attitude can eff right off

This looks like javascript so let me guess the typescript definition

any|unknown

this is a joke, please chill

Could have been funny if you weren't comparing their generic plugin based IDE with one of the pre-set, python ones. The descriptions are fine.

This also ironically highlights exactly the horrors and the business model of the intellij IDEs but that's a rant for another day

Not OP but yes, it is quite exciting tbh

Here is one of the programmers who is quantum ready as well

Is someone checking human summarizers as well? I mean, humans make mistakes but also generally adds flavours, and can focus on things due to inherent bias. In fact, this is actually an area were bots can probably produce more factually correct and unbiased summaries than humans (depends on the quality of course).

The way past both is to actually read the article?

We get it, you are disappointed. But if you are concerned about saving cash you should've probably waited to buy it yourself this close to release.

But it doesn't objectively suck, it builds on the world, and does so decently. If you liked it before you are probably going to like this DLC.

Imo it's not been redefined at all. People are just pushing the boundaries of what it means and creating absolutist views on what it should mean. There is a space for that sure, but shaming companies that define where their own boundaries are is not the way of it.

If we do that, you are challenging what software freedom actually is if you ask me

Your argument falls flat because the Windows source code has never been distributed under open source licenses. Access to the source code does not mean you can redistribute it automatically. Hence its a choice. If you choose to redistribute closed source code, that's on you.

I really want this to be his legacy. People in 30 years going "man, did we really elect a Florida Man for president?"

If the people selling are passing someone else's work as their own, that's stealing. Otherwise, it's just Free Software working as intended.

Do you not see the contradiction in this statement? Where do you find the line of what is stealing and "working as intented"?

If someone is writing software but wants to prevent redistribution, then go ahead and make a license that forbids it. But then don't get to call it "Open Source" or anything like that.

There are so many licenses for this model already, I'm inclined to believe that you havent actually published any OSS yourself and your attitude in these threads are mildly said, off putting.

I am a big fan of OSI and support their work, but you are treating them (based in what i can read in this thread) like some holy, all defining entity, of what is open source. They are not, and true open source, cannot, and should not, ever derive its power from a central agency setting rules and definitions. If that happens, that will be the end of open source.

Please stop gatekeeping OSS, it hurts all of us

Edit: some autocomplete stupid grammar

Not op but yes, I actually do. Dev for about 20 years, and the vast majority showing vim/emacs struggle when presenting. Could be presentation jitters ofc but the answer to:

You think thousands of developers are handicapping themselves for bragging rights?

Yes, yes I do. Thousands is not all, but they are definitively in the thousands

It's a reference to a historical increase in internet and usenet usage, and a massive influx of users in many forums.

It isn't more generic than its the same IDE but with presets and plugins loaded already. Thats the point, sorry if that was unclear.

"I like horses". Proceeds and takes one of my horse with one of their horses. I take their horse with my pawn. "Don't fuck with my horsies" I get as a response.

Two-three turns later (this was 20 years ago, forgive me) I can check them by grabbing the same horse with a bishop.

"Why dont you like my horsies"? I get as a response

I proceeded to check mate two turns after that. It was a competition, I proceeded to the semifinals after this. I lost that semifinal due to a skillful check mate including a horse to lock it down. And the person from the previous game leaned over at the end turn saying " that is my backup horse"

I laughed my ass off and I'm not sure I could get of the check situation but fuck I lost my focus

Yeah, i know the pain. Screen settings can help (lower your light) else Firefox with dark reader can help as well perhaps

But it wasn't that long ago all browsers standardized support for detecting dark mode so it will likely become better as the years go. I hope

But there are honestly a shit ton of assumptions in this statement. Who says they are traveling themselves? This might just be "scouts" or drones doing basic survey and mapping of the universe and might be automates.

Don't get me wrong, i beleive this is BS. But assuming they actually want to land, or that they need to, is a bit of a fallacy the we tend to get stuck on

Jeezy creezy, why do people dont understand that it's not about personal preference or that dark mode is not for everyone (far from it).

https://community.openux.design/c/resources/dark-mode-vs-light-mode-which-is-better-by-nielsen-norman-group

You can stop reading when you find the answers to the requested questions.

Eh no not necessarily. This depends on the type of audit and the questions specifically, but should never be a default stance if you want to provide a full report. Moreover, if you are learning to do software audits, it would be beneficial to check everything because experience is key to know what you are looking for

Never in my life I thought I would spend time thinking about assless chaps. But I will die on this hill with you

Your argument there also falls flat because you are making the argument "i made an an irrelevant argument to prove this other point". You are by your own points arguing that this is bigger than grayjoy and using Windows illegally leaked source code as a reference to that argument? I dont really care about what grayjoy does at this point, it will prove itself over time , but you furthering some idea of of OMG through your sensationalist headline and this point that what grayjoy is doing is a threat to open source code, OSI, and the free software movement is just unnecessary fear. I'm past 40 and let me tell you. Chill. The average user does not care about OSS, the engineer does. The real threat comes when we have nowhere to distribute or host the code, or even can write code that isnt touched by rules and regulations. What a singular entity choose to brand their code as? Has happened hundreds, if not thousands of times before. And all of those instances have garnered no business based on it. The actual threat is Oracle and the likes, not whatever half measure grayjoy is so IMO you skip the sensationalist headlines. And chill. You can judge them if you want but this isn't a threat to open source in whatever form

Typescript doesn't really remove anything you learn in JavaScript. Like at all. It's not really a library as such. It adds ways to enhance your JavaScript, with typing, structure, and tooling

Learn JavaScript as much as possible. Every bit you learn will benefit you with typescript

I echo those exact feelings. Amazing game, great story, but the touch of it still lingers. The story and the mechanics and how they echo eachother is just wow

See reply here: https://beehaw.org/comment/476775

However, I bet that tomato can be removed and you wouldn't even notice if no one told you

... Is a sentance I never thought I would read in a million years

These hearings and there witnesses doesn't really seem to cover one event just, but a continuous effort and knowledge from the military to keep it under wraps. Just 3 people with knowledge of talking to people that know about multiple events (sounds legit hrm). One event they have talked about is about an alleged landing with alleged biologics, but they are also referencing other video releases over the past few years from fighter jets

It is, the one that starts with lower case is called camel case. As in camelCase has a "hump"

Not a bad comparison but fallout 1-2 are decades ago so quite a jump in graphics and stuff. Huge classic fallout fan, and I enjoyed shadowrun so you might like it

Its important to understand that:

• JavaScript is typescript
• Typescript is JavaScript with types

When you are writing typescript, you are writing JavaScript but have additional syntax to help support type safety and structure. If you are creating a function that does x, it should very much be the same in JS and TS, just in TS it has extra syntax

TS doesn't modify the way JS works, its one of the stated needs for the tooling.

In TS, for example, I can denote an object as

const x: Record = {}

In JS it would be

const x = {}

It's still nothing but an object. TS doesn't change the functionality, it just adds typing and checks that you are using that object properly as static build step.

Your notion of an engineer is correct in a wide sense

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineer

The fact that you feel programming is not that makes me sad. But likely dependent on what software and what you work with. For example, if you build software for NASA or Baxter and dialysis machines and the likes, you'll get fired fast for not being structured. Working for Elon Musk and Twitter... Well...

This article talks about galaxy formations and stars bursting, curious how you jump to "life" from that?

Indeed I did, sorry about that

"in this essay" The article you've written is not an essay. It is at its top, an opinion article

And as Vodulas points out, they generally serve as a game mechanic. Either you are recreating set guns from history or it's lower level gun meant to be a bit crappier.

What even is this articles point? Iron sights are crappy? Yeah, we know, that's why that was improved upon and they barely exist on IRL guns today

WASM is great and as it becomes more accessible it will likely take over more and more

OPs meme is just a sign of someone not understanding the softer parts around development. The meme also seems to forget that we tried java in the browser for two decades and it was just... Horrible from all perspectives, in all layers

I personally think it's a bit of a fallacy to equal structure with less creativity.

Look at Calatrava https://duckduckgo.com/?q=calatrava&t=fpas&iax=images&ia=images

Further, you can't design something like the Burj Khalifa without creativity

Maybe the line goes where you are risking peoples life or not, maybe somewhere else. It still makes me sad that you equal programming with chaos. But that is very context driven. The drive for new software, new interfaces, new tech overall naturally breeds less oversight and less structure naturally ofc. But it doesn't have to be that way, nor should it be if you ask me

I think you might have a point there. I for one was not aware of the gay frog situation before that whole drama and I'm grateful it was brought to my attention

You are mistaken and don't seen to fullt grasp what copyright is.

A copyright is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the exclusive right to copy, distribute, adapt, display, and perform a creative work, usually for a limited time.[1][2][3][4][5] The creative work may be in a literary, artistic, educational, or musical form.

Notice what is states besides copying? First paragraph on wikipedia, come on.

"in this essay" The article you've written is not an essay. It is at its top, an opinion article

And as Vodulas points out, they generally serve as a game mechanic. Either you are recreating set guns from history or it's lower level gun meant to be a bit crappier.

What even is this articles point? Iron sights are crappy? Yeah, we know, that's why that was improved upon and they barely exist on IRL guns today

They can be, sure. I enjoy tomatoes otherwise. I can enjoy eating them like an apple or those cute cherry ones as snacks. But generally there are other ingredients on a burger (dressing, cheeses, bacon, whatever) that makes the tomato disappear completely and just become a watery slice of nothing but annoyance.

Tomatoes are fine, just keep them of my burgers.