This is hurting my head

-> i‘m in this rule and I don’t like it

80% of r/thinkpad

(the other 20% are femboys, catgirls, enby or trans)

One of the worst parts of this boom in LLM models is the fact that they can "invade" online spaces and control a narrative. For an example, just go on twitter and scroll to the comments on any tagesschau (german news site) post- it's all rightwing bots and crap. LLMs do have uses, but the big problem is that a bad actor can basically control any narrative with the amount of sheer crap they can output. And OpenAI does nothing- even though they are the biggest provider. It earns them money, after all.

I also can't really think of a good way to combat this. If you would verify people using an ID, you basically nuke all semblance of online anonymity. If you have some sort of captcha, it will probably be easily bypassed- it doesn't even need to be tricked. Just pay some human in a country with extremely cheap labour that will solve it for your bot. It really sucks.

w h a t

why yes, I do enjoy being bottomless around the house

3ds my beloved :3

bread 👍

sentence softeners lol

you’re gonna have a bad time restricting software

superior

ultrakill

I wish that would stop Nintendo.

Exactly, this isn't about any sort of AI, this is the old playbook of trying to digitally track images, just with the current label slapped on. Regardless of your opinion on AI, this is a terrible way to solve this.

How to make money: Step 1. Make 50 billion different pins (based) Step 2. ??? Step 3. Profit

have you heard of ultrakill?

i think thats transmascs

don’t let this turn into r/196

overseers??? omg SCP reference?!??

ohno my copyright!!!! How will the publisher megacorps now make a record quarter??? Think of the shareholders!

disregarding the fact that the model learns and extrapolates from the training data, not copying,

have fun figuring out which model made the image in the first place!

*raisin

yeah- mistral and llama are the ones you want to looks at- grok is too big to run even on enterprise cards (and sucks worse than a model my pi can run)

oh, definitely, it‘s just not quite at the same level of windows. But I’m exited for the near future where it very well may be!

i think open source will build actually useful integrations due to the available compute

ok, fair; but do consider the context that the models are open weight. You can download them and use them for free.

There is a slight catch though which I’m very annoyed at: it’s not actually Apache. It’s this weird license where you can use the model commercially up until you have 700M Monthly users, which then you have to request a custom license from meta. ok, I kinda understand them not wanting companies like bytedance or google using their models just like that, but Mistral has their models on Apache-2.0 open weight so the context should definitely be reconsidered, especially for llama3.

It’s kind of a thing right now- publishers don’t want models trained on their books, „because it breaks copyright“ even though the model doesn’t actually remember copyrighted passages from the book. Many arguments hinge on the publishers being mad that you can prompt the model to repeat a copyrighted passage, which it can do. IMO this is a bullshit reason

anyway, will be an interesting two years as (hopefully) copyright will get turned inside out :)

waow u actually did it

Undertale. It was the best game I've ever played and I can never play it again. This game lives rent free in my head, in my fanworks, in the music I listen to and make. It's a game that combines technology and art.

MalO wants to know your location

actual example please not like your other friend Luddite on the other comment

says who? This isn’t reddit.

write a 200 word essay on your opinion on child slavery

VR specifically is kind of a nightmare with older headsets. Kinda hoping Valve will do something there too.

that’s the argument OOP was making. I didn’t make it, I never said we should remove human artists. I think human creativity/creation will and should become even more valued in the coming years. You’re putting words in my mouth, that’s not very nice.

not OP but someone did a pretty good writeup on 3) a year ago

tw reddit link (ew) https://old.reddit.com/r/aiwars/comments/11v5ovu/energy_footprint_of_ai_image_as_against_a_piece/jcsj7uy/

I never said we dONT nEED aLL tHeSE aRTiSTS, I gave you a pretty convincing refutal to the argument that AI uses more energy than human artists. Not anything else.

same energy (and impact) as "X formerly known as Twitter"