Nora

And British people made English, but they don't say anything right either.

I disagree. It's a moral issue. What if someone was wrongly convicted? Force them to go against their moral system? I personally couldn't bear to eat the flesh of an animal. I get this dudes a criminal but like, I don't think the issue itself is laughable.

That is so the opposite experience for me. Every other distro for me just ends up weird after using it too long and I get the symptoms you mentioned. Nixos always stays perfectly clean for me like I never touched it. My hardware (long story) does change my experience a little though.

liberals and their damn SCIENCE

Whoever invented all the words in that sentence certainly didn't pronounce them like you do.

did jeff bezos downvote your comment?

??

How can I simultaneously agree with you and the other person?

nooooo dont peel the stickers

take it apart

This is a completely different topic but okay.

Since you want specifics, veganism isn't actually about animals, its about sentient beings. I wouldn't eat a cow or a dog or a human, because they each have the capacity to suffer and the desire to live. Anything that has this capacity is off the table for vegans. Even bugs, while obviously being less sentient than a cow or human, still demonstrate this in some capacity. So no, I just eat plants and fungi. Technically I could eat a jellyfish or even an oyster (although vegans debate it), since this capacity has not been demonstrated by them. Why would I harm others for my own pleasure/sustenance when there is an alternative, especially an alternative that is cheaper, healthier, and far more sustainable?

Yeast is a fungus by the way.

unrelated but how do people get normal shiny hair like that? mine just gets clumpy if it gets moved around

Is range some dialect-specific word? I've never heard that one.

either way the average joe is gonna need to do something cuz the billionaires wont. lets just kill them

dairy industry be like

weast

I like them because they have a consistent style and can represent so many types of people (strawmen)

and coined it before the vegan society existed. They aren't the owners of veganism. Its a philosophy. Don't ignore the rest of that comment either. Or stop making this stupid point that no vegan actually believes

"virtually" impossible. hehehe

What a coincidence, my name is also Jugemu Jugemu Go-Kō-no-Surikire Kaijari-suigyo no Suigyō-matsu Unrai-matsu Fūrai-matsu Kū-Neru Tokoro ni Sumu Tokoro Yaburakōji no Burakōji Paipo Paipo Paipo no Shūringan Shūringan no Gūrindai Gūrindai no Ponpokopii no Ponpokonā no Chōkyūmei no Chōsuke

Okay continue making a stupid point instead of listening.

you are the one acting like a ten year old rn

complains about gay people getting married

"I don't give a damn about homosexuals"

once again, called your point stupid. you are making shit up

not if its a big enough industry to control the legislation. animal agriculture is a nightmare

Source: I'm a vegan and interact with other vegans...

Didn't call you stupid, I called your point stupid. Why couldn't you consolidate these replies?

i didnt say i don't agree with them. I'm saying your are overanalyzing the definition. this whole argument is opinion, everything is going to be anecdotal...

Your opinions on Italian food are probably wrong and I love drinking piss

Perfect, now we can agree the vegan society is just an organization

this makes this conversation impossible to keep track of. you're just spamming my inbox

you are misusing a definition. its like using newtonian physics for large scale systems. newton wasnt wrong but his equations aren't great for talking about galaxies and black holes.

And? That's one organizations definition, and the reason they say "all animals" is not because they give jellyfish moral value, but because most nonvegans only respect the rights of humans and a few animals like dogs and cats. So we say "all animals" to generally say we are being morally consistent. Jellyfish and oysters just happen to be edge cases of animals existing without sentience.

That was not an appeal to emotion. It's asking for a logical justification. Do you think actions that harm others, deserve consideration regardless of whether or not it makes you feel bad? It's about how the victims feel.

Does your own pleasure justify harm against others? Can you think of other actions where this kind of justification might be problematic to you?

i love toads so much

Pfff what? I clear 30g easy. Half a box of whole wheat spaghetti is 20g. A cup of dry pinto beans is 48g.

the only one saying these phrases is you.

return the earth to its rightful crustacean owners

deaths per time

was that the bite of 87?