overcast5348

At this point, I'm not sure if I should interpret that as "very recyclable" or "barely recyclable".

An example of search engines failing me miserably last month:

I wanted to hire a photographer, so I started searching using keywords like "wedding photographer MAJOR_CITY_NAME", "photography MCN", "event photographer MCN", etc. The top results I got were all mostly along the lines of "top ten wedding photographers in MCN" i.e. listicles with links to a few photographers who probably paid the listicle creator? There were maybe one or two links to a photographer's website itself in the first page.

I'm okay with ignoring the first page of results and moving on to following pages. But rather than giving me individual photographer's websites in subsequent pages, I started getting listicles for "top ten wedding photographers in OTHER_CITIES". I'd click through multiple pages of results to find maybe 5 direct website links.

What actually helped me find a photographers eventually was entering the exact same key words on Instagram. Almost every single one of them that I found on Instagram had an excellent website and the city name, and their addresses were mentioned clearly on their websites. So, it wasn't a case of them not having enough information on their website. It's just that search engines chose to prioritise listcles of photographers from other cities rather than giving me links to individual websites of photographers in my own city.

In this case, I got lucky because photographers have a presence on Instagram which has a functional search engine. What if I want to find a plumber, or someone else? I'm forced to just trust a listicle creator because search engines don't want to give away links to single purpose websites and only want to keep us on websites with a shit ton of content (that may or may not be what you need) and ads.

/rant

I lick it clean before putting it in the fridge.

^^/s

I've had at least one code reviewer ask me to put all the logic in the if ... line rather than use a variable or two in order to "simplify code by reducing the number of variables."

At the very least, this article helped me confirm my own bias of "that guy is a moron" and I can send this article to him the next time he reviews my code.

Who is this clown?

ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada): ಶಂಖದಿಂದ ಬಂದ್ರೇನೇ ತೀರ್ಥ - shankadinda bandrene teertha.

Literally: it's holy water only if it comes from a conch.

Meaning: people are only going to take things seriously if a specific person says it.

Example scenario: you tell a friend that a cab to go somewhere costs X amount, but they don't believe you and check with a different friend and then accept that it's going to cost them X.

You'd then say this idiom to tease them since you gave them the same water (information) but it wasn't holy water since you weren't a conch (someone they trust/have faith in).

Somebody who isn't a pedant would interpret that as "All trained surgeons performing this procedure on their respective patients with the same condition would be fine. So me, a trained surgeon, performing this procedure is also fine."

In a former workplace, we had a process that was close enough to what's recommended in the blog, and it worked well. Really well even, there were hardly any ego clashes, everyone would negotiate a consensus and we had "spike" tasks in our sprints so that we can take the time to think about and research complex problems.

And then the fire nation attacked...

A director left the firm and they hired someone from Amazon. He said that we should have a "bias for action", and got rid of this process, and a lot of other stuff we had going for ourselves using other such catch phrases.

Getting him as a director was probably the worst thing to happen as we were under pressure to deliver stuff quickly all the time, and we'd then have to rework most of the shit because of missed requirements, or tools used not being insufficient for the task at hand etc. He was okay with it though, because "we delivered (shit) quickly", and "our efficiency went up as indicated by the team velocity charts".

Pretty much the entire team had left the company in ~1.5 years, and customer satisfaction metrics were in the gutter when I left.

I don't know if he misunderstood "bias for action" and implemented it badly or if that's genuinely how people at Amazon operate, but I won't even think of joining AWS. Fuck that noise.

The trilogy of songs by The Lonely Island ft. Justin Timberlake.

I say that I like "garbage pizza" because that's how everyone around me treats the pizzas I like. I don't like the "good pizzas" that everyone keeps raving about. I'll take Domino's or Pizza Pizza any day of the week.

But what does the old lady have to do with any of it?

...but you get to work with some ground breaking technology!

Honestly, the terminal is probably not going to be that hard to use for you. Considering that you're on lemmy, you're probably ahead of the curve in tech skills. Maybe don't go picking something in the deep end like arch though.

/j I use arch btw.

Yes. What if someone MITMs me and chops off the poor horse's leg?

Sub to a bunch of hobby communities and browse only those rather than the "all" content if you want to get rid of the doom. You're gonna have lesser content to consume, for sure, but that's just a bonus in my book.

SEO itself is fine - it's just optimising your website website for whatever a search engine considers important.

The problem is that search engines' seem to have absolutely garbage metrics for what is important and worth it.

But USA numba 1. /s

The default US-ism is frustrating indeed.

ELI5 of certificates:

The "s" in "https" in urls like "https://wikipedia.com" stands for "Secure".

When you connect to Wikipedia's computer to read something, how do you know if the content you get back is what they actually sent and wasn't altered by your friendly neighborhood hacker?

Wikipedia can "sign" the content before sending it you. They also give you a certificate telling you how they have a particular signature which has been verified by someone else whom you already trust, and how long this particular signature is valid for.

If a hacker tries to alter the document returned by Wikipedia, they wouldn't be able to sign the document correctly. If they tried to give a certificate with a different signature too, you would catch it because they wouldn't be able to fake the verification of the "someone you trust" so you'd catch the fake certificate.

Browsers handle all this stuff for us. If it detects something fishy, it'll just show an error along the lines of "could not verify certificate". In some cases, it's genuinely an issue where you/the website is under attack and you may get a virus.

In some other cases though, it's an issue of the certificate expiring and the guys at Wikipedia not being proactive about getting a new signature and certificate. If you are ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that you're just dealing with a lazy developer and not a malicious hacker, you can tell your browser to ignore whatever issue it detected and show you the content that was returned by Wikipedia.

Thanks for attending my TEDx talk.

69 isn't "the funny" number because it's an ambigram. It's the "funny number" because it's the sex position number.

You're one of that's 10000: https://xkcd.com/1053/ :)

Yup, I watched that too!

Be prepared to be "There it no war in Ba Sing Sae"d soon.

Your mom never existed.

Can you even create an account on ddg? What data do they have on you?

Not being argumentative, I'm genuinely curious.

The mushrooms, worth 3.7 million dollars, are to be transported to the incinerator in a truck.

What did namecheap do? I've got a bunch of domains with them. 🤦‍♂️

No, you're a boring pussy.

/s

Libby for books from the library. Moon reader for other epubs.

This guy S_20xxxxxxx has a holier than thou comment ranting about the "assholes from reddit being pieces of shit on lemmy", ironically, on a thread about people being aggressive on lemmy.

A few hours later, he replies to some comments of mine - every single one of them makes him sound more unhinged than the last.

I went through his comment history and his comments swing between these two extremes of being preachy and being unhinged. I decided that blocking him and moving on was better for my sanity than continuing to engage.

There's no point in engaging with such people, do what's best for you, and move on. Cheers! :)

I was scared of reflog too. Had to use it for the first time recently after I accidentally'd a branch that I hadn't pushed to remote yet. I was so glad that I could recover it all in <5 commands.

Lack of healthcare availablity, lack of good transit connectivity outside of like 3 cities, insane housing cost, low wages - especially compared to the US... The list is long.

I love it here, but it's not even close to utopia depending on your circumstances. I personally know 2 recent immigrant families (I'm an immigrant too, so I run into a lot of them in community events etc) who went back to their home countries within 2 years of immigration because they were diagnosed with medical conditions that needed attention which the healthcare system here could not give.

Todoist works great for me. I like the recurring tasks feature which lets me clear up a lot of headspace. "Clean XYZ every 11 days #chore" is all the syntax you need to setup a recurring task that's categorised under the "chore" category.

Have you tried diluting your cycle with some water or turpentine to reduce its viscosity?

...and the website should have all that information, right?

I can't tell of that community is a joke or a mental health issue.

Duolingo taught me "wilkommen" for "welcome." Is that used IRL?

Thanks!

"it actually depends"

Yes, it depends. But in this scenario we're not discussing if statements with one or two conditions. We're exclusively discussing multiple complicated conditions. :)

Thanks!

Magic is purple! * Throws chair *

It's not as bad as Google yet, but I find myself getting terrible or no results quite a few times.

Ex: if I'm looking for a niche blog post from example.com, just entering the keywords doesn't return the right result, if anything at all. I have to add "site:example.com" and the right link shows up on top.

It's kinda amusing when this happens, but I keep using ddg anyway because bing and Google had the same issue for the same keywords when I ran into the issue.

C has some uses other than K/S. The usage in "ch"ess, for instance. We'll have to shoehorn some other letter here if C is eliminated.