He criticized him what more do you people want
He criticized him what more do you people want
The last new functionality that Reddit added that was actually good was subreddits.
That's not an answer to the question and your reading comprehension is bad if you think it is.
You won't have more issues with it than you'll already have using Windows.
You absolutely will, and the ones you get will be harder to solve. It's far more useable than it used to be, but the overall experience with Windows is still easier.
BUT it probably is quite usable for you overall. Just don't go into it expecting nothing but smooth sailing.
No pigs were harmed in the making of these scams
You think they've actually tried? Given that they're still supplying weapons to them?
Something tells me you have an opinion on js frameworks
To respond to your edit: no, you just shouldn't bring your phone
You can't harden your phone against every hypothetical because you can't think of every hypothetical and it's dumb to think you can. Why would you think you alone can outsmart teams of very well-paid people who literally sit around all day thinking about ways to track you using your phone?
Your phone literally can't even have signal without your carrier knowing where you are, so why bother bringing it?
Nobody said "unacceptable". They said Biden isn't going to win because he's a bad candidate.
Then bring a camera that can take videos?
Did you just link to a source that said both sides broke it and act like it said only one broke it?
Super weird that when you commit a genocide against a people and then colonise their land they aren't thrilled about it.
"oh no, don't", whispers biden from the sidelines
I merely disagreed with your proposal in detail and asked you to defend it if you were so convinced of it.
So you're just strawmanning me? Because at no point have I made a "proposal".
What position do you want me to defend? So far my position has been that the US should be doing more to apply pressure to Israel.
How do you disagree with that WITHOUT taking the stance that any other action would lead to a worse outcome?
Pointing out that cutting our nose to spite our face is a bad policy
Again, what is this hypothetical cutting of the nose?
If you say that doing anything more than what the US is currently doing will "do worse than fuck all", how is that not an endorsement of that policy? You're saying it's the best option.
You have an interesting perspective on the world
Israel doesn't need any support past the US preventing the UN from actually doing anything concrete, which is exactly what the Biden administration is giving them.
With the exception of airdropped supplies into Gaza, which other countries are also doing, and that hasn't been enough to prevent famine, what would Trump even do to make things worse?
Committing US assets to a war in the middle east is one of the three things Trump's voter base won't actually support.
Why are you getting into weird hypotheticals? If it's a republican, it will be Trump. If it's not, because he straight up dies, they'll still be the same voter base: a voter base which isn't going to accept boots on the ground.
"Pressuring" Israel has done precisely fuck all, which is my point. Because by "pressuring" you mean "asking nicely".
And you're right: a republican wouldn't be different. That's what I'm saying.
I don't care about the weapons. Israel obviously doesn't need more weapons to finish their genocide.
It's just pretty obvious that you don't make a real effort to prevent a state completing it's genocide before you stop supplying them with arms.
You're right there's absolutely no solution remotely possible, and that justifies the complete lack of even trying anything spicier than "Bibi pls"
My guy you're literally saying there's no solution that isn't worse than doing what the current administration is doing, which is more or less nothing.
That's not a straw man. That's just restating your argument at you.
Propaganda bots on a site with like 12 active users is more likely to you than people not wanting to vote in support of genocide?
I suspect it was more likely that nobody used wordpad because, well, why would you? So supporting it is more pain than it's worth.
I don't think the wordpad to office pipeline represents quite the cashflow you're implying