https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/general_recommendations
Take your pick.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/general_recommendations
Take your pick.
For 1, grub is fine, but systemd-boot is simpler, so I'd say that as 'use grub if you actually need it'
For 2, has this actually ever happened to anyone in uefi times? Mbr overwrite was the good old times, now we have something at least better
Yes.
If we define stable as unchanging for release cycle, yes. Just really hard to come up with equivalence with these two otherwise.
Quick, someone make a yt video that explains even less with more confusion and a word from our sponsors!
Sir, either you troll, or have the wrong idea why the distros mentioned are different things with different goals.
In case it was intended seriously, I'll probably descend into madness because of the ubu lts = centos stream assessment.
Not reading the whole thread, but ltsc or looking into ameliorated playbooks seems like the right answer
Five years on wayland here, it's been great as long you don't have single Nvidia gpu or need https://xkcd.com/1172/ kinds of x11 features
You summarised it nicely why gnome people frustrate me
I'll necropost because it's funny. A tuber does a thing, suddenly it's the largest ever :D I think we've been preserving abandonware for a few decades
Well, I do miss the "fuck you mauro" livid linus, yes, nowadays he goes more for 'brevity is the wit of soul'
Weird way to misspell desktop environment. Or wm defaults. A gnome reskin isn't a distro.
I had no idea ppl actually cared about any fetches, not like it stopped working though. Just a guess but it'll work for a good while, because it's a damn fetch script:D