Unionize
Unionize
Don't worry if you miss it though. A super blue moon doesn't look any different than any other supermoon and there are usually three per year.
The existence of natural intelligence is the proof that artificial intelligence is possible.
Adjusting prices wouldn't have gotten you more trucks, would it? Ostensibly you'd still have just as many people that couldn't get a truck or had to travel. There was a spike in demand that wasn't being met.
They've already said they'll seize his ny assets if he refuses to pay.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
Speak for yourself I'm happy to have Biden again.
My favorite cynical take is save yourself some time and effort, find someone you hate and buy them a house.
Archaic hardware and software requiring downtime on the backend to do standard maintenance like backups, software changes, changing vacuums tubes, pulling moths out of relays.
As opposed to modern hardware and software architectures that allow for standard maintenance without downtime.
So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time.
A lot of things need to happen fast to reduce the impacts of climate change. Amongst them it's gaining the knowledge of how to do all of the things that will need doing sooner or later. Lots of ideas will fail for various reasons. The more tools we work on the better off we'll be.
The other thing is it really coming at the expense of other decarbonization efforts? Or is it happening in parallel with other things.
It doesn't stop the other work well need to do, and I'm not convinced it's a net negative. I think there's room to experiment at this scale and make adjustments as we progress. Hydrogen for instance is its own can of worms and it's not clear it's the best solution, but maybe it will be. We should work on it.
What's in there could only make you sick.
Rito
They don't. You're a shark now.
Somehow old is the only bad thing you can say about him. I'm not going to say there aren't other people I'd like as president, but I do think this is a dangerous game. We need unity against the other guy. We need solutions, not shitting on the best situated candidate. I'm sure you don't have one.
Tinidril's post is an oversimplification, so much so as to be misleading. My post I believe would fall into the technically correct bucket.
The Senate doesn't confirm the next president for life. The VP is sworn into office if he were to die. I'd be happy to have Harris in the office too.
The democratic choice is the one people vote into office.
Because he's good, Harris is good. The other guy will take a wrecking ball to the nation's institutions to enrich himself at the expense of his enemies.
What I got from your post was a false equivalence. I'm really tired of people shitting on a legitimately good choice because they aren't getting exactly what they want. Or are Russian trolls, it's hard to tell the difference these days.
The other guy has already said he wants to be a dictator. I'm hostile to people that will get him elected either through direct support, or trying to kill enthusiasm for the better candidate.
For the love of everything, at least let's stop decommissioning serviceable nuclear plants.