It does seem a bit slower than it used to, but it also seems more stable than it used to and I don't think that's a coincidence. These days I also see the occasional package pulled when it introduces issues which is not something I recall happening in earlier years. I think it's great, personally.
restarossa
0 Post – 12 Comments
Joined 1 years ago
I'd think it should be opt in, but they're not even willing to entertain the idea of having neither selected and have the user choose on the basis they'd typically select to opt out. Perhaps that means you're in the wrong.
It is ridiculous! I'm sure it'll do little good but I sent some feedback at https://www.youtube.com/tv/feedback
fail
Don't know. The AUR is a big reason I use Arch. I use about twenty or so packages from it, many of them not packaged for any other distro.
Haven't ever needed them on Arch. Probably never will.
They just have the .net though.
I use them on both. I use more of them (6) on my desktop, and I use them more often, but only because I'm usually doing several tasks on my desktop while my laptop is for more casual use and I only require two or three. I mostly use Gnome and bind Win Key+Num for each workspace.
Well that would apply to any distro I've used.. they're all going to have things that aren't in the main repos. It's a feature for Arch in that on nearly every other distro it's probably going to be more of a pain to install them.
Jerboa is working well for me so far.
Isn't this something else though? Meta's is .net isn't it? So even they couldn't get the .com...
edit: Indeed it's nothing to do with Meta, though it seems kinda related. Bit surprised Meta went with the name actually.
But I don't want to reward people that do this by watching their videos