/me peers at my $300 Samsung S10e bought 3 years ago, my $1200 Asus ROG Strix laptop, and my $400 TCL 4k TV and wonders if your quoted prices are inflated merely to justify your own pre-order. Not sure where your buying stuff but you should really shop around, those prices are horrendous...
Well when Karen asks for the 40th time how to add a new user to the system, Karen's getting referred to the documentation.
I know, Congress should be ashamed of themselves. We would be hard pressed to find a group that had a worse understanding of technology
I guess, according to this article, car insurance companies are encouraging people to drive recklessly and kill others in their vehicles, simply by providing them with insurance against the bodily injury of others. I'm not sure how the author doesn't see the parallels between any insurance that guards against reckless behavior and the NRA's insurance. To be clear I'm not a user of their insurance or a member of their organization, just finding the lack of introspection in the argument used in the article appalling.
I think that's the point, the people who care about things like the API changes have already made the migration, the rest of the losers stuck there in rubbit don't matter to us, and as other posters noted this is likely the group of people is productive. Who cares. Leave them behind.
Not sure what this vast collection of resources is that you're pining over. Theeye, among the vast majority of actual piracy resources, were never really on rubbit anyway.....
And who the f wants recurring payment reminders during gameplay...
Even worse, they'll claim it was a bug
I the FDA can't even keep up with trying to approve legitimate pharmaceutical drugs, let's not task them with looking at random s*** too.
No that's the case in the US too. I never ask why my employee wants time off, I don't need to know any more about their personal lives, they tell me too much already...
I'm not sure why you take issue with the facts that the word aggravated in this context means that the people are implied, or that adding words is not easier to read. It's okay that you didn't know what aggravated means, but it still doesn't change the fact that this is redundant information. Redundant information is harder to read, and the specific gender of the victim does not add anything to the context for the headline, a de facto harder to read title. It's possible that this was done on purpose, or that the author was also unaware that aggravated means people are involved and felt they needed to add words.
You're right about the backyard but that would involve a person or people. If the discharge is aggravated, by definition it implies that people are involved. Adding the gender of the person that is implied is done for an emotional response from certain groups by not providing context that is useful. We fill in the blank with our biases.
It's probably best to look at what the devops industry is embracing, environment variables are as secure as any of the alternatives but poor implementations will always introduce attack vectors. Secret management stores require you to authenticate, which requires you to store the credential for it somewhere - no matter what there's no way to secure an insecure implementation of secrets access
I think that they're saying that the person is implied, aggravated discharge of a weapon with no person involved is just target practice.
Google be in trouble then
That's just as insecure lol, env vars are far better
Regulation seems completely unrelated, this was the human need to "do something, anything". Perhaps you can elaborate on the link and relieve my ignorance.
Yes, and I find them indistinguishable from liberal subreddits. The echo chambers are pretty easy to find..
Meanwhile, libertarians are staring at both the extreme left and extreme right and wondering what the fundamental difference is...
But the same could be said for almost anything, for instance a car's engine is non-theoretical but could be otherwise done with a horse instead. I will still prefer the more advanced technology, but of course you do you
That's just a blatant lie, a 30 second search on the internet returned plenty of information about this substance... If you can't establish enough confidence that some random drug that you buy at a gas station isn't the really legit, don't buy it? Ugh, we are doomed at this rate
I think both the left and the right are concerned with restricting rights, they just have different views of which rights it's okay to obstruct.
I believe libel laws already exist, but when you're in Congress you must make laws in a reactionary way otherwise considered thought and reason might begin to permeate the law. We wouldn't want that.