Sorry about my confused rambling 😅 Yes, the example was to demonstrate the difference between subnetting and vlan. Albeit simplified. What you said is right.

The poster i was responding to equated subnetting to vlans. I might have misunderstood what they meant though. It sounded like they wanted to use the same subnet per vlan, which wont work if you want them routed in the same gateway.

Reading it again they make it sound like you can't subnet all of these networks on a switch without vlan, which you definitely can. I could for example connect 4 different devices on the subnet 192 168.10.x/24 and have them reach each other. I could also connect 4 more devices in the same switch but on a different network 192.168.20.x/24 and it would work.

Is it transphobia when she isn't trans? Stop feeding the trolls. I bet she didn't ask anybody for opinions either way.

Good for her on winning

By making a bridge in the opensense interfaces you have created a layer2 network. This means that all the devices connected on that network are broadcasting their Mac addresses and are added to the ARP table on the opensense. Since they all are on the same physical network and the same subnet, none of the traffic will ever hit the layer 3 rules on your opensense.

If you want opensense to handle the rules of the traffic you will need to put the devices on different subnets and separate clans. Create a gateway address for every vlan on the opensense and point your devices to the opensense as their gateway.

Give use the URL and that 100-number might go 🚀 For testing purposes, naturally.

I don't think we have a Swedish one. But we call clockwise "medsols" and counterclockwise "motsols". Meaning "with the sun" or "against the sun" Does everyone have reversed threads on plumbing or is that a Nordic/Swedish thing? All plumbing has the reversed rule, left tightens and right loosens.

Homophobic is just religious in this case. Meaning that "the boys" include all the women too.

My guess is that the server receives the packet from the client with src .11.101 dst .10.102 and tries to respond over the interface that has .11.102 assigned. The client expects a response from src .10.102 and drops the packet. But I would turn on a packet sniffer in the gateway to see if the returning traffic even passes the Firewall in scenario 1.

Went from rif to connect for Lemmy and i'm happy with it

Personally I would have gone for OpenVPN access server on Debian. Fairly simple and well documented for those starting out.

I have used and worked with OpenVPN connect on android, PC and Mac.

All that means is that there are more important issues https://youtu.be/ZMQqz6IPado?si=rYskhuX76IzTGupe

"mainstream media" - you mean like this echo chamber? I literally never would have heard of this nonsense if if wasn't for Lemmy. So yes, i would gladly have ignored the stupidity for what it is, stupid. Acknowledge the stupidity of it and move on. I'd much rather talk about the thousands of good things that the Olympics bring out. Like her winning after likely practicing her fucking ass off and putting life on hold for this one dream.

Hahaha thats brilliant

No, not really?

In this case it's a response to a pretty obnoxious comment. You could argue that the comment op is acting like an apple fan, ms fan or any kind of thing fan that enters a conversation.

It can't be answered in this context, cause there is no context in the post.

Pretty interesting read, but far from conclusive. As they said in the study. 15-23 random people from each group gathered from social media isn't exactly what I would call bulletproof. Just by going through male puberty you would have a physical advantage by being taller.

I could give you an example. In my kitchen we have a faucet with a detachable aerator. We detach it when we want to use a attachment for a garden hose. When attaching the aerator or the garden hose attachment, the threads are reversed. I might be wrong, but two opposing threads shouldn't be able to screw into one another right?

It has to do with link priority on the server. You'd imagine that a server that receives a packet that has a return address on the same subnet as it self logically would use that interface instead.

A similar thing happens in switches. For example if you have two vlans on a switch and both vlans have an ip assigned, connect a computer to one of the vlans. You will only be able to reach the switch on the non-routed connection. Even if you also are allowed to reach the second vlan through a router/Firewall.

It also comes with a dyndns-client built in. Very useful for updating the address of the OpenVPN server.

Reset the AP to make sure it uses dhcp for its own ip and update firmware from unifi network after adopting the AP again.

Test it by swapping places of the access points to find out if the issue is related to the access points or something else.

OpenVPN connect on both. I load the .ovpn-file that is exported from the server and that's it.

For those uninitiated, it's a mix between orange and apple soda. Pretty fuckin good. My favourite has to be Portello or Julmust.

Sure, go for insults when you can't argue the point.

Why do you think I'm only talking about Palestine? At no point did I ever single out Palestine or Palestinians. Both are the same sort of religious zealots.

It's almost like you would have a physical advantage by being born male. See no issues with transwomen competing with men though. Technically the mens divisions are the "unrestricted" entries.

You can't use the same subnet on different vlans if you ever intend for both of them to reach the internet. In that case you'd need a second router which just defeats the purpose

Yes, they believe in a different fake man in the sky from the other ones, and that justifies their actions. Religion is poison for the mind.

...and why do they fight over the land? Could it maybe have a little something to do about the various nonsense they believe that was made up by un-scientific societies from 1500-3000 years ago?

Stop trying to make it a recent conflict over something logical when it clearly isn't.

So you're just gonna ignore the reason why they fight to begin with? So they can just do exactly the same thing again in a year or two cause the primary reason remain?

They can't coexist with make-belief-reasons to kill each other.