tryitout

Correct. The safest option is extracting it yourself directly from the fox. This also protects against man in the middle attacks.

Just signaling his own intentions if given the chance.

“It doesn’t even make sense to me why someone would want to eat that,” Balsick said. “For us as humans to think that we can make a product better than God can is interesting.”

Vs

Are nuggets made with lab-grown chicken a more questionable choice than, say, milk from a cow that’s been fed ground-up chicken waste, a common practice which experts say may be contributing to the spread of bird flu?

That reminds me of this study I read that anyone will believe anything that looks like a screenshot of a reputable news article.

The luck bit really clashes with the survivorship bias.

You need calcium.

Businesses of a different industry can use the same name. There is nothing keeping you from using the website for blogging. The computer store might be problematic if it could be construed you are trying to profit from EA's established trademark. Also, why would you want a .org for a storefront? I'd say get a different domain for your computer store.

I believe the board is mostly installed by Musk so it would likely take quite a bit.

Gore did win.

Is the ground supposed to be whispering?

The time that he complained he wasn't making enough money was after he took a $267,000 loan for a luxury RV so this comes across as him wanting a lavish lifestyle instead of actually struggling.

That's every meal there.

You could make so much money playing Russian roulette!

Same thing happened to me when I tried to update my phone number and address at the same time.

Rather telling that the Trump supporter at the end of the video has difficulty spelling YMCA.

Unfortunately they welcome the arrival of their murderous God because they think he will destroy all the icky people.

The only thing I would add to this is carefully use a hair dryer to loosen the adhesive on the sticker first. Should leave less mess for the goo gone to deal with.

Such a scum bag move by Sony that I have to buy another DS5 to play this with my daughter on PS5 when I have several perfectly good DS4s whose only purpose at this point is to occupy a landfill it seems.

He spent a bunch of dough on that hair. I believe he is likely aware of his appearance. He is pale and overweight because he spends a bunch of time playing video games, being a nazi in his failing social media site, and (based on this picture) eating french fries.

Maybe at some point his vanity will compel him to get liposuction or just go full orange man with spray tan and wear baggy suits with ties that are too long. I don't see him being like Bezos or Zuck and getting into shape.

I like my burger like I like my jeans: high and tight.

They thought Leather-Daddy Long Legs was a bit too much.

Give the crested geckos their independence! (My only knowledge of New Caledonia is gecko-based).

Please tell me everyone has figured out that all large companies are pure fucking evil

Fixed that for you

Actually, it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

/s

Bill Gates wants you to get the Cootie shot so NASA can track you with 5G antifa satellites and chemtrails.

Sounds like tractors need to be ITAR controlled.

They should make dubious food from BOTW/TOTK next.

You're right that default credentials should have gone away a decade ago. From my experience with security cameras, default credentials were the norm ~5 years ago and now most prompt you to create a unique password. That industry typically lags slightly in infosec best practices. I would expect routers to require a higher level of security.

Which is better, "urine us" or "your anus"?

He needs a bike with like 1000 gears

Dave Grohl has come a long way

I also heard "respect muh authority"

Damn, you've perfectly described my ex-wife.

Any protections to consumers are a win. I think overall this will be a positive for gamers.

IMHO this ruling is shortsighted and pushes for a future with increased monitisation that isn't in the box value of the game and targets to hurt the Devs that make consumer friendly games while giving games with loot boxes and microtransactions an advantage in the market when talking in terms of overall sales for the devs.

Your last paragraph could hold some truth if publishers think this will affect profits. I don't know if this would significantly impact profits since we're talking about a new secondary market that did not exist in the digital space before. There's probably some historical data for how physical used game sales affect new game sales but it might be hard to quantify since that market has existed pretty much from the beginning.

I would anticipate another across the board price increase for games as a result, but I see this more as an excuse for greed on the publishers' parts rather than a cost to offset any actual lost revenue.

I agree that microtransactions and loot boxes in gaming need regulation as well. Hopefully this is a step towards that.

Even the name Penguin is a hybrid of polar and penguin.

Course not, they probably funded the bill that puts the onus on consumers. Through taxes, bottle deposits, and various fees, the consumer is being wrung dry trying to create the appearance of offsetting corporate environmental destruction. All we're doing is helping condense power and money into a shrinking pool of world destroyers.

Sounds like you have nothing to contribute.