You can't say something is "objectively" better than. Then proceed to list "subjective" opinions. Clearly you dislike gesture navigation, which is fine, but that doesn't make it objectively worse.

You started out asking whether it's a game or simulation, then ended up talking about card pulls. Clearly it's a game then right?

Not the same thing. Games aren't built for every specific PC configuration. You've always adjusted graphics settings on PC depending on what your machine can run.

Let's say that's something Microsoft would even allow, it diminishes the ability to compete with the PS5. Why would I get a Series X if there's a chance that some big game launches will have less features than other current gen platforms?

Microsoft really hamstrung this generation of consoles by releasing the S and demanding it runs feature parity with the X.

But sometimes you might just want to go back to something you upvoted, without needing to save every post or comment just in case.

I literally posted an article where developers are yet again complaining about having to develop for the Series S and that it isn't as easy as just "optimisation". So maybe you can ELI5 how developing for consoles is exactly the same as developing for PC?

What is/are Moto Flashlight and Camera gestures? And what phone do you now have?

It already has it. If you click on your account and then edit, you'll have the option to add another account.

But they're the same topic, so there's a good chance there's gonna be repeated content across both. Particularly if not everyone is subscribed to all instances.

I'm subscribing to both, but will be interesting to see how duplicate content across instances are federated in the future.

That article is from 2021 and doesn't provide links or details to any data. The claim in the article says it's 50/50. But again, no data is provided.

Of course. Why didn't those stupid developers think of that.

Sounds like you haven't watched a lot of free to air tv haha

Your post isn't divisive because you wrote better instead of faster. You used the term "objective" incorrectly, and are continuing to. There's nothing wrong with having an opinion, or even testing things out for yourself. That doesn't make your point of view objective.

But you don't have to have all those subscriptions. You get YouTube Music included so you don't need a separate music subscription. You also don't have to worry about working out the latest app/add-on/plugin/site that lets you play YouTube without ads. It's pretty good value actually. I get more from it than I do my Netflix subscription. I rotate my other subscriptions based on the shows I'm watching. I always have a YouTube subscription and don't foresee stopping it just coz I can't go back to ads haha.

I wonder if most of the complaints of ads on YouTube are coming from people who subscribe to something like Netflix, but spend just as much (or more) time streaming YouTube.

Do you have any data to back any of your claims? If not, that's what makes them subjective. In your opinion, button navigation is faster. Doesn't make it objective by any stretch.

The event is being held 4 Oct, so shouldn't be much longer.

Exactly, it was a crappy stop gap solution.

I'm with you. I'm already seeing duplicate posts/links shared across instances. Trying to work out how managing subscriptions will look as the platform grows.

How does any of that mean that "it's very much the same as optimising for PC"? Are you saying that developers optimise for every PC configuration possible?

Someone else posted that you can run the game on a PC with weaker specs than a Series S. So clearly it isn't the same.

It could be worth cross posting this to !homeautomation@lemmy.world

I'm sticking with Voyager for now. Sync is too expensive for a beta app. There's no post functionality in it yet. I'm also not sure how I feel about paying so much for an app to access Lemmy. I'd rather put some of that money into the instances themselves.

Does this work for link shares as well? There's multiple android and gaming instances that often have duplicate content shared.

"Because Xbox mandates that any games launched on its current-gen systems run smoothly on both Series X and Series S" - from the article

So no, they don't get to just pick the minimum specs they support like on the PC version. They have to build a game that runs similarly on S and X, or not launch on either. Hence, the S is always going to limit what devs will be able/willing to do on the current gen consoles. More so than if they could just focus on the X and PS5.

*LEGO

But the Series S doesn't run the PC game. Just like PC's don't run the Series S version of the game. I'm confused. If it was so easy, why isn't every game available on every platform on day one?

This post is asking what apps are worth paying for. Someone suggested Sync is worth paying for. I disagree and offered a different opinion. No one said you had to pay for it, just whether it was worth paying for or not.

My comments are actually after seeing the local pricing. I still think it's too expensive. Perhaps other locations are more affordable.

I hardly watch it either. Just found it funny all the complaints above could be applied to what free to air tv has been doing for decades.

Hey guys, you should get a Series X because BG3 is coming out. Sure it will be missing features that you'll get on the PS5 like split screen, but you guys understand we need to support the Series S and have parity between our two consoles.

So even though you spent more money on a Series X, that's capable of running the full game that the PS5 is getting, you should just be happy that you're getting the game at all. Don't worry about having paid for a console that's capable of more.

-Microsoft

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/objective

It's not a walled garden, it's kind of the opposite. You can connect devices regardless of brand and it's a server you can run locally. In theory you wouldn't need to update it or ever connect it to the internet again, as long as your devices can run locally.

If you have an old laptop or a raspberry pi 4, you can always give it a try before scrapping what you're currently using.

The article I shared was developers complaining about having to optimise for the Series S. But you're saying that it should just be the same as PC optimising for PC. I completely agree with your answer in that Microsoft stipulates rules for the S. That's the point. It isn't the same as PC. Developers have to specifically work on getting games to run on the Series S. I'm so confused as to the point you're trying to make to me, when in another comment you acknowledge that developers have different standards they're required to meet for the S. We seem to actually agree.

I do! Would probably give up my Netflix subscription before YouTube to be honest. As a family, we spend more time using YouTube than most other streaming services.

If it's so straight forward, then what are the devs complaining about?

Microsoft requires they meet a specific standard on both the S and X, which is making it harder for them to do. They don't build to every specific PC variant. But they have to build to both the X and S.

As long as it's not LEGOs I can get behind that.

Yeah but I'd see one, scroll a little further and see another. Then scroll a little further and see another. Sure you might see some repeated posts on Reddit, but the problem is exacerbated if there are multiple instances of the same topic.

For example, if I saw the same post on /r/Google and /r/Android. The problem could be four times or more worse due to there being multiple instances of Google and Android federated.

I'm enjoying Lemmy, but it'll be interesting to see how this might be dealt with for those that want a single feed per topic.

But YouTube still is free. This article isn't about YouTube not being free, they've just increased the price of their subscription (like Netflix and Spotify do routinely). You just expect to get it for free and without ads. I'm confused at who you think is paying to store and stream all those videos if it was entirely free?

Going down the rabbit hole of YouTube getting it's content for free is a slippery slope. I see what you're saying, but YouTube is hosting and streaming that content for those content creators. That isn't cheap. It's a double edged sword. Because you likely wouldn't know or have access to those content creators if they weren't able to upload those videos to YouTube and not have to pay to provide that service themselves. Is it perfect, no. But name another completely free streaming service.

And I'd argue it's not entirely comparable to Reddit and Twitter. Both in cost incurred to store and stream that data, and they pay those content creators who generate a lot of views. Again, another rabbit hole in terms of what payment is fair etc. But it's not a fair comparison to put YouTube in the Twitter and Reddit bucket. It probably sits somewhere in between Spotify and those social platforms.

Edit: I forgot to point out the biggest issue with your comparison to Reddit and Twitter. You seem to forget that those platforms also have ads.

I'm not sure I see the problem. Is there a reason you expect to be able to use the service for free and even ad free?

I might only listen to a few songs a week. Is it fair that I have to sit through ads when I try to listen to them on Spotify? I don't really want to pay for a subscription, especially because I already pay for YouTube. Clearly paying the full subscription cost for Spotify isn't worth it in my case.

Edit: Don't mean to sound like a smart ass. But as you can see, you can basically swap Spotify for YouTube in your argument. Spotify is just more valuable to you, which is fine. That doesn't mean you should get the other thing free. Just like I shouldn't expect to get Spotify ad free.

Sekiro. It's hard.