Hah, I didn't want to say "except Kamala Harris" but that may be the truth after all.
On the other hand, it could be racism rather than misogyny. I have a feeling Taylor Swift would have no trouble winning. 🤣
Okay, yeah nah I'm with you. I like to think that's what I was getting at, but you said it better.
If I could vote for Biden I too, would do so without enthusiasm. Let's hope he steps down though. I swear anyone else has a better chance at this point.
The US political system has some issues. That's why. Ask the DNC.
Hey, at least you got a reply. 🤣
If you're poor though they just put you in jail while they figure that stuff out. If they figure it out.
Ironic how the reverse will never happen. Only the right-wing benefit from less people voting. It's such a shit asymmetry.
When you're a psychopath of one description or another, who knows what might motivate you?
Most of us normal people are content to be free to spend time with friends and family doing the things we love. Imagine if you couldn't give a shit about that, and that's basically the world's most successful people.
Their lineages have spent recent human history honing capitalism to be the vessel for the freedom of their kind. Money buys you freedom from consequences most of the time. That shouldn't be possible.
The internet opened up their world for us to see, and for a moment it looked like we might sieze control. Instead, we let ourselves be manipulates into thinking they do in fact give a shit, or at least if we tag along we'll be winners too.
The names we know are the ones who court controversy for the thrill.
Elon Musk is an excellent example. Whatever talents he has are moot next to his moral insanity. All he cares about is having a legacy, and achieving the things he wants. He just pays lip service to any real altruism. I mean, he's the last person who needs to preside over horrific working conditions. He even bans PPE because he doesn't like bright colors.
If only telling morons not to be morons was the solution to morons being morons.
Yeah... There's a bigger question too that is, why can't other foods containing Vitamin A be supplied to the starving people of the Philippines? There are so many sources.
Let's consider how fucked it is that even considering introducing this crop to the wild is necessary.
I've previously supported golden rice, but you've changed my mind. We should just be doing more to support developing nations directly. The world has sufficient abundance we shouldn't need to take these dangerous shortcuts. Not yet.
Try me when we're closer to Mad Max earth.
That's a very good point I've only just really let sink in. Trump not passing go and going directly to jail will mean chaos and collateral damage, perhaps globally. Things have to be done delicately for all our sakes unfortunately.
Hmmmmmm
Is the royal family not the richest in the UK? Edit: Not just me wondering this I see!
My understanding is that it was a Tumblr fad that became viral outside of Tumblr because it's easy to recognize the absurdity, and it made a great target for ridiculing the woke (back when "woke" was a complement, and we just called this sort of thing being "politically correct").
Point is, you can't just impose new words on purpose. Language doesn't work that way. It's all about the viral memes taking off. So it's always best to adapt existing language.
"They" is finally clicking in my mind as a singular gender neutral word, for example. It took a while, I have to admit.
I don't like Greenpeace, but these are good arguments.
'Something' is what we abstractly call that which is both not nothing and has some significance to us beyond being merely anything.
To shreds you say?
Make smoking around others outside or in public without other's consent illegal (i.e. you can complain to police if you don't like the smell), and introduce a rule you can only smoke on licensed premises (with smoking rooms) or at home.
That's what some places have done with tobacco smoking. It is basically harassment or assault in my view to have people consume your second hand smoke and smells.
Edibles on the outer hand, or if you create flavored vapes that don't smell much or travel far in the air, all good.
Lack of creativity among conservatives is never surprising.
Also it's already illegal for kids to do weed, smoke or drink.
What, where?
Work is fine, if it's meaningful to you. Consuming is basically everything we do that isn't "work". And death is inevitable.
If we didn't all have to do soul destroying jobs when we're young, I think we'd grow up with less of a desire to waste our youths trying to die young taking stupid risks in the name of YOLO or whatever. It also doesn't help most of us never stop do sounds south destroying jobs.
But it doesn't have to be this way. More progressivism is needed to get us toward a post-work future. Check out 'solar punk'. That's a future worth wanting.
Three US democratic party is fairly "conservative" relative to European social democracies. That's all.
The side effects and risks are worth it when you only get one shot at puberty. If you don't transition as a pre-pubescent teenager, you will never "pass" as well, especially as a transwoman.
A really good example of how successful you can be if you're early is Corey Maison. There are cases of transition regret of course, but they're still a very small percentage of the total, and that percentage is reduced by puberty blockers giving young people more time to figure out themselves and their own bodies, and to make the choice that's right for them.
That's exactly what I'm saying we should do. Brown rice ironically while it is food, might be like giving a baby an economic pacifier instead of trade milk and expecting it to grow. The Philippines has a range of biodiverse crops and other commodities that have more value than just the one food to feed them all, which would undercut the market and stifle local knowledge over time.
That said someone here suggested a more advanced plan to seed the beta-carotine gene into the native species, which is awesome in theory, but could create patent law violations and just generally be incredibly risky to the very biodiversity we're trying to protect.
This is why I think while the science is very cool, we should avoid such irreversible treatments unless it's a last resort.
Mosquitos on the other hand. Love the idea of genetically editing those fuckers out of existence. As the world inevitably warms, malaria is only going to spread further and wider. We should be getting ahead of that catastrophic future while we have the chance.
That's honestly just worse if true. How is this not criminal? He doesn't go to jail unless the state is what he's ripped off? You know, the one by the people for the people?
The good news is that if someone went back and changed the past, then events would transpire such that they never had to go back in time for that reason, and so they wouldn't., i.e. nothing would change. Not unless the whole exercise spins only the time traveler off into their own new universe in which they're the only one with a memory of this alternative timeline from which they came.
Absolutely, unless they're also drinking - but then weed may also be mitigating some of alcohol's worst effects. Alcohol reduces inhibition, while weed often causes anxiety. Alcohol increases propensity for violent behavior, while weed usually calms you down.
It's also important to point out, it's still illegal for kids to be doing either if the things in the first place.
I do. He needs to go to jail eventually, or at least be made ineligible to run for office, or both. But if law enforcement locked him up tomorrow I think that could be immediately destabilizing of American society and the ensuing riots could cause massive loss of life and destruction, if not all out civil war, frankly. The cult of Trump is not insignificant. I live in New Zealand, and even here I encounter Trump pariahs all the time. We are living in very interesting times.
The asymmetry here is the most frustrating thing, but building things has always been harder than tearing them down. Dealing with Trump and the cult surrounding him, and the phenomena that actually made him possible in the first place (social media and the outrage and misinformation economy that has infected news media and the entire information space), is probably going to be the project that defines this decade, and that all other projects depend on for their success (like dealing with climate change). So it's one that if we fail, could set us back to the early 1900s or worse in terms of global societal cohesion. I don't think I'm being hyperbolic when I say this.
They could also commit to giving 10% of their personal income or 2.5% of the value of their ne worth (whichever is greater) to the most effective charities now, while they're waiting for the taxes to come.
Chris Anderson (of TED) has suggested this and had the math run, and worked out if every ultra wealthy person on record in the world did this it would generate enough money solve basically all pressing concerns to do with poverty and climate many times over (so we don't even need all of them).
It's never going to happen though, because Chris hasn't accounted for the fact that most people who acquire wealth to this degree are some degree of sociopathic or at the very least believe somehow they're entitled to be as wealthy as they are. So we need government regulation. Problem is we need it everywhere all at once, or these people just move their wealth around which can still severely damage the economy. But some countries, especially smaller ones, need to be brave. Europe taxes their wealthy reasonably well, and it's clear it makes living in those nations better. More need to lead by example.
That's what I meant too, so yeah. Other than the driver's seat of course.
What about when rice prices crash and local small scale farmers go out of business?
I don't follow. What goal posts have I shifted? I don't deny that rice is easy. My point is that it's a shortcut that could have other negative consequences that more funding could avoid.
I just said what "directly" would actually look like after you said to help then directly. I didn't endorse this approach necessarily. My point is that getting them to grow our GM crop is not "direct".
I feel that you're intentionally trying to one up me instead actually have a proper discussion here. Why not assume my intention here is to change my mind because together we might actually figure something out? This back and forth is all a waste of time otherwise.
My actual opinion is that we give them monetary aid conditioner on certain outcomes, and send in experienced people to support transitions to more sustainable and productive food production. The money can upgrade housing, farming and transport infrastructure, and help boost Vitamin A rich crop yields and sale prices. Also subsidize imports if Vitamin A rich foods to make up the difference if local yields are insufficient.
Expensive, hard work, job creating activities, instead of shortcuts.
Shit posters are often some of the most insightful on issues like this. Comedians are not above picking sides when it comes to the culture wars. I would have thought the idea of Taylor Swift as president would be better received here than this. Not least of all because of how much it would piss off Trump. Even just more memes about it would be encouraging.
Depends on the type of accident, but generally as far away from the point of impact with the bus as possible.
On balance of likelihood that's going to be the back of bus.
High speed rear end is unlikely for a city bus. Most likely the bus rear ends someone because it can't stop in time, or a head-on collision of some kind on a narrow road.
You won't be getting universal healthcare, decent paid parental leave, comprehensive worker protections, or 4-8 weeks' holiday pay per year for the foreseeable future.
Got the top row at Big Day Out here in NZ circa... 2004 or 2005 I think it was? Was pretty neat but the accoustics was so bad could barely hear anything.
This.
Direct would be doing the farming for them, or handing over food directly. Or sending in workers to train local farmers to grid Vitamin A rich crops.
Rice is a shortcut, and sure it might "work", but there are other potential long-term externalities at play here, that golden rice alone is insufficient to account for. It would be a plaster covering a surface wound when there is internal bleeding to worry about.
I’m sorry that the only example you actually floated immediately contradicted your previous position of not driving farmers out of business.
How does supporting local farmers drive local farmers about of business?
Except there are kids whose lives and health we can save, right now, if we just start growing golden rice.
"Right now" would be mass sustained imports of Vitamin A supplements. Golden Rice still has some ways to go to be establish on existing rice farms, and then enjoy a successful growing season, even if it had been approved to proceed. If we want to "think of the children" seriously, money shouldn't be an object and we'd be looking at multiple strategies all at once, and not relying solely on an experimental product like this.
We are talking about extremely poor people and areas here, where there is little or no infrastructure to support this as a long-term solution.
Sure, but that's part of the problem isn't it? Why don't we also go in and fix that right now?
What you are suggesting requires drastic change and a lot of upfront money, and continued on-going long-term support and financial assistance.
Indeed. Don't get me wrong, I know it's never going to happen. Given that fact, perhaps we need cheap and nasty shortcuts like golden rice in order to help poor people save themselves with minimal outside resources. Potential patent issues aside if the gene mixes in with local rice varients, and other risks to the environment, it would be great if there was more Vitamin A available in their poverty diets. But, I can see why there is opposition to this. It makes sense, and it's not just "ignorant" people like me who think this, clearly.
I hope you're right. The fact all the polling data puts Trump at an almost 50% chance of being re-elected if allowed to run is not encouraging, and it's almost like the closer we get to locking him up (or out), the more popular he becomes.
His followers lack critical thinking skills. But so does the overwhelming majority of the population. That was really my point.
It'd be fantastic to not have the dramatic music and narrative overlay and have a translated version of the original footage and any dialogue that's going on. We have Al Jazeera to blame for that though.