San Francisco bakery sparks debate by refusing to serve armed policestopthatgirl7@kbin.social to News@lemmy.world – 641 points – 1 years agoindependent.co.ukBusiness says it doesn’t serve anyone who is armed174Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentDon’t give them ideasIdk gives me some costume ideas tho. Introducing: SUPERCOPThat would blow up in their face at this point. None of them want a challenge to section 1983 now that we know the full text of the law. It would strip them if qualified immunity.
Don’t give them ideasIdk gives me some costume ideas tho. Introducing: SUPERCOPThat would blow up in their face at this point. None of them want a challenge to section 1983 now that we know the full text of the law. It would strip them if qualified immunity.
That would blow up in their face at this point. None of them want a challenge to section 1983 now that we know the full text of the law. It would strip them if qualified immunity.
Don’t give them ideas
Idk gives me some costume ideas tho.
Introducing: SUPERCOP
That would blow up in their face at this point. None of them want a challenge to section 1983 now that we know the full text of the law. It would strip them if qualified immunity.