Todd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC'

Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.world – 411 points –
Todd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC'
pcgamer.com

You heard him 4090 users, upgrade to a more powerful GPU.

198

You are viewing a single comment

4090 is definitely nuts, but with inflation the 4080 is right about on par. As usual team red very close in comparison for a much lower cost. You don't have to constantly run the highest of the high level to get those sweet graphics, but it's about personal taste. Personally it's not for me paying the 40% more for a 10% jump in graphics, but every 2-3 generations is when I usually step back and reanalyze. Tbh usually it's a game like starfield that makes me think if I should get a new one. Runs great for now though, probably have at least 1 hopefully 2 more generations before I upgrade again

4090 is definitely nuts, but with inflation the 4080 is right about on par.

On par with the competing product? Sure. On par with inflation? Not by a long shot. GPU prices tripled a couple years back. Inflation accounted for only a small fraction of that. They have come down somewhat since then, but nowhere close to where they should be even with inflation.

As usual team red very close in comparison

Indeed. Both brands being overpriced doesn't make them any less overpriced. Cryptocurrency and scalping may be mostly gone now, but corporate greed persists.

That's not Todd Howard's fault, but when he makes a snarky comment expecting everyone to cough up that kind of money to play his game, it's more than a little tone deaf.

I'll admit didn't know the 4000 was that high, but yeah 1200 for the midrange card is too much. If it stays like this I may switch back to team Red. I do believe costs are probably higher, (I remember buying my first board with an AGP slot), the ones now are... a bit more complicated and complex to make, but the jump from 800 in 2020 to 1200 in 2023 is too much.

the 4080 is right about on par

Adjusted for inflation in the US, the 1080 ti cost only $876 in today's money when it came out. The 4080 launched at $1231 in today's money. You are simply incorrect

The dude digs a hole and then grabs a bigger shovel

Some people just really love a company and will do anything to excuse their shortcomings

Starfield is poorly optimized and that's really all there is to it. I'm sure in a few weeks modders will (once again) fix some obvious issues. Bethesda has no incentive to do the work themselves when the community will do it for free

Okay I'll admit I didn't know that's how much the 4080 was, last time I checked was the 3000 series and yeah, that's a lot. (I thought it started around 8-900) I stick to my points though, if you want ultra gaming, it's going to cost an arm and a leg. My main point is still shouldn't expect older hardware to get ultra settings, and that's okay. You can play a game on medium settings and still have a blast.