X sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisions

gsa32@lemmy.worldbanned from sitebanned from site to Technology@lemmy.world – 529 points –
X sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisions
arstechnica.com
32

You are viewing a single comment

It's not even that.

California: "Please tell us if you allow nazis or not. We just want you to be transparent."

Elon: "California is trying to pressure me into banning nazis! If I disclose I'm cool with nazis, people will be mad and they'll want me to stop. Also, a lot of hate watch groups say I'm letting nazis run free on X, and I'm suing them for defamation for saying that, but if I have to publicly disclose my pro-nazi content moderation policies I'm going to lose those lawsuits and likely have to pay attorneys fees! Not cool California, not cool at all."

I’m suing them for defamation for saying that

Not actually suing, that would require discovery which would lead to losing and more importantly forcing them to disclose their moderation policies. It's just an empty threat to sue so nazi sympathizers can point to it and "see they don't allow nazi's."

I kinda wish those groups would just pull an Uno Reverse and actually sue ElMu for defamation just to trigger the discovery process.

Though, I'm fairly certain it doesn't work that way. But given how pants on head the rest of the court system is, I also wouldn't be surprised if it did.

Wild that in 2023 we still have to discuss this nonsense. Nazis are always wrong. It's so easy not to be a Nazi. It's so much extra work to be a bigoted ignoramus than to just... not be that.

This who can do. Those who cannot teach. Those who cannot even become Nazis.

2 more...
2 more...