Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine

L4sBot@lemmy.worldmod to Technology@lemmy.world – 1057 points –
Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine
arstechnica.com

Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine::Google accused DOJ of aiming to force people to use “inferior” search products.

182

You are viewing a single comment

Not sure why "old+judge" automatically equals "tech illiterate." The judge in another high-profile Google case taught himself to code

The article you link says the judge already knew how to code beforehand.

He’s been coding in BASIC for decades, actually, writing programs for the fun of it: a program to play Bridge, written as a gift for his wife; an automatic solution for the board game Mastermind, which he is immensely fond of; and most ambitiously, a sprawling multifunctional program with a graphical interface that helps him with yet another of his many hobbies, ham radio.

Yes, because he taught himself.

“At some point, I looked at the BASIC book and decided I would learn that.” He taught himself straight from the book, which he recalls was “pretty straightforward.”

It's because these things work by probabilities. Generally when you think of older people who aren't working as IT professionals, you wouldn't expect them to be great with computers - and you'd probably be right.

Do you really think that a judge that taught himself to code would be common-place and would be the norm? That judge is awesome, but he is very clearly an outlier lol

Knowing how to code doesn't mean you know the difference between a search engine and a web browser.