Some Works In Progress You're Looking Forward To?

pastermil@sh.itjust.works to Linux@lemmy.ml – 94 points –

What are some exciting projects that you follow and hope to see progress on?

I'll start!

  • Wayland greeter on SDDM
  • rust support on gcc
  • more Wayland adoption (especially VSCodium & Firefox forks)
  • Reproducible Build
  • ReactOS
67

You are viewing a single comment

So it's kind of like RAID?

It has RAID modes and it intelligently rearranges data s.t. commonly used files are stored in a fast drive and fetched from there, whereas BTRFS will write to and read from a "random" drive regardless of its speed.

The previous solution of using btrfs raid1 + bcache (not the FS) separately was very wasteful because the cache had to store both/all copies of the data since btrfs picks a random drive to read from.

Does it provide any advantages for home users? I can see how this could be useful in enterprise settings, but does it benefit regular desktop users?

Yes, lots of storage space with redundancy and the speed advantage of an SSD. If you have enough data where a pair of reasonably priced SSDs is not enough then it is highly advantageous to combine them with (cheaper/bigger) HDDs.

Personally I would not consider a filesystem without data redundancy for my personal files, and I have enough pictures to fill some hard drives but I don't like waiting for them to load.