Wikipedia Ruleladam@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 384 points – 10 months ago14Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentNope. That's literally what this article is about: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/-ussySurely it should be "donussy", not "donutussy" Also I never want to hear about Thatchussy thank you very much wikipediaThen change it. It's WikipediaI might later. Thatchussy seems like it might have to stay though given it's in an actual paper on the subject ..What about the Don, and his donussy?
Nope. That's literally what this article is about: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/-ussySurely it should be "donussy", not "donutussy" Also I never want to hear about Thatchussy thank you very much wikipediaThen change it. It's WikipediaI might later. Thatchussy seems like it might have to stay though given it's in an actual paper on the subject ..What about the Don, and his donussy?
Surely it should be "donussy", not "donutussy" Also I never want to hear about Thatchussy thank you very much wikipediaThen change it. It's WikipediaI might later. Thatchussy seems like it might have to stay though given it's in an actual paper on the subject ..What about the Don, and his donussy?
Then change it. It's WikipediaI might later. Thatchussy seems like it might have to stay though given it's in an actual paper on the subject ..
I might later. Thatchussy seems like it might have to stay though given it's in an actual paper on the subject ..
Nope. That's literally what this article is about:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/-ussy
Surely it should be "donussy", not "donutussy"
Also I never want to hear about Thatchussy thank you very much wikipedia
Then change it. It's Wikipedia
I might later. Thatchussy seems like it might have to stay though given it's in an actual paper on the subject ..
What about the Don, and his donussy?