if you could standardise a file format for a specific task what would you pick and why

jackpot@lemmy.mlbanned from sitebanned from site to Linux@lemmy.ml – 209 points –

if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because...

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

  1. photos .jxl
  2. open domain image data .exr
  3. videos .av1
  4. lossless audio .flac
  5. lossy audio .opus
  6. subtitles srt/ass
  7. fonts .otf
  8. container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
  9. plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
  10. documents .odt
  11. archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
  12. configuration files toml
  13. typesetting typst
  14. interchange format .ora
  15. models .gltf / .glb
  16. daw session files .dawproject
  17. otdr measurement results .xml
283

You are viewing a single comment
View all comments

.exe to .sh low key turn all windows machines to Linux machines

You're comparing compiled executables to scripts, it's apples and oranges.

I, for one, label my apple crates as oranges.

winebin="wine"
if file "$1" | grep 64-bit; then
    winebin="wine64"
fi

printf '%s %q $@ || exit $?' "$winebin" "$1" > "$1.sh"
chmod +x "$1.sh"