Starfield locked to 30fps on console, Bethesda confirms

Dasnap@lemmy.world to Gaming@beehaw.org – 34 points –
Starfield locked to 30fps on console, Bethesda confirms
eurogamer.net
50

You are viewing a single comment

I'd rather see consoles be limited to what they can handle than a game to be limited for everyone because of what a single console can handle.

I want this game to be huge and look beautiful. If my PC can handle 60fps I don't want to locked to 30fps because that's all an Xbox can handle. And if I want to play it on an Xbox I don't want it to be a blurry mess to get 60fps, I want it to look as good as it possibly can. Especially in a game like this where the visuals do a great majority of the storytelling when it comes to exploration and finding new things.

the fps lock isnt on pc

Yes, I was praising that. I may have worded it in a confusing way.

Fully agree, I hate this recent trend of consoles effectively bottlenecking PCs.

It still seems way to common for an engine to have other systems tied to FPS, so e.g. running at a higher framerate will mean the physics engine also runs faster, or all animations are faster.

As a game dev: this is 100% the developers fault. The engine knows how long it's been between frames. Devs can use that information to keep everything running at the same pace regardless of 30fps, 10, or 120.

Next time you see a game with its speed tied to the frame rate, make sure you make some noise! Maybe devs will finally fucking learn.

More annoying than a constant 30fps framerate is an inconsistent framerate, which a game like this is likely to encounter very frequently if not capped.

I don't like it, but I'd rather have that than what could likely be worse.

i wouldnt be too sure that fps and physics are tied, they managed to separate them for 76