YouTube isn't happy you're using ad blockers — and it's doing something about it
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7c668ec0-a3ad-455f-b736-1f5f13808b09.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
![YouTube isn't happy you're using ad blockers — and it's doing something about it](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/765d537b-6a32-4a12-9e53-f4d90a12b8bd.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
mashable.com
YouTube isn't happy you're using ad blockers — and it's doing something about it::undefined
You are viewing a single comment
YouTube isn't happy you're using ad blockers — and it's doing something about it::undefined
What kinda bothers me is that I recognize that something like YouTube is expensive to run and just switching to an alternative isn't super feasible. I would be more than happy to pay for a service like YouTube that I use everyday. HOWEVER, not with their bullshit double dipping. If I am paying a company like Google to use their services, I don't think it's unreasonable that their should be an expectation or mechanism where that means I am not just no longer served ads, but that all tracking and data collection about my account(s) are stopped.
That's never going to happen though :/
You mean like cable that we paid for and got ads or like your cell phone/ISP provider charging you while selling your data simultaneously?
Yeah, I never said I thought it was tennable or that any system like I described has ever actually existed. Wishes and dreams, ya know?
That's a fair criticism. I personally don't care about it because I gave up on the idea of having any privacy ages ago but I get that people may not be happy with that.
If I were to play devil's advocate, I can say that the data they collect is important for serving you the right videos but let's be real here, Google definitely uses it to serve you ads everywhere else