San Francisco says tiny sleeping 'pods,' which cost $700 a month and became a big hit with tech workers, are not up to code
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7c668ec0-a3ad-455f-b736-1f5f13808b09.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
![San Francisco says tiny sleeping 'pods,' which cost $700 a month and became a big hit with tech workers, are not up to code](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d9f2e23c-2a63-4ae5-896e-1969f81ce2d4.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
businessinsider.com
San Francisco says tiny sleeping 'pods,' which cost $700 a month and became a big hit with tech workers, are not up to code::The pods, which are 4-foot-high boxes constructed from wood and steel, made headlines after tech workers praised the spaces.
You are viewing a single comment
That's the problem, and this is not a reasonable solution.
I think the solution is to move somewhere cheaper with fast Internet.
I don't argue that there aren't any better solutions, but SF is on a peninsula (called Yerba Buena if anyone cares) and is already the 2nd most densely populated city in the US, which is just to say that it's a limited space without a lot of options for housing short of building in more density.