What could go wrong giving the Inte(r)net (u)nfi(l)ter(e)d access to DallE 3?seaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone – 356 points – 12 months ago18Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentmicrosoft's content safety algorithms with dall-e 3 are strict as fuck, thoughMy grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.That's why the post mentions unfiltered.but the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?Not with that attitude.what does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?
microsoft's content safety algorithms with dall-e 3 are strict as fuck, thoughMy grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.That's why the post mentions unfiltered.but the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?Not with that attitude.what does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?
My grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.
That's why the post mentions unfiltered.but the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?Not with that attitude.what does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?
but the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?Not with that attitude.what does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?
microsoft's content safety algorithms with dall-e 3 are strict as fuck, though
My grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.
That's why the post mentions unfiltered.
but the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?
Not with that attitude.
what does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?