Australians vote No in referendum that promised change for First Nations people but couldn't deliver

AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.world – 204 points –
Australians vote No in referendum that promised change for First Nations people but couldn't deliver | CNN
edition.cnn.com
85

You are viewing a single comment

An advisory body for a particular race is by definition a division based on race. Say hypotheticaly there was a body in the constitution called the "nazi advisory body" where u had to be a true arian to join, would you agree that is blatantly racist? If so what does it matter what race it is or what its called its still a devision of race by definition.

For you first point see the timeline of all bodies i have posted in this thread may shed some light on ur over generalisation.

Second putting the voice in the constitution doesnt address that whatsoever if you want to put recognition of histories ateocities in the constitution put recognition of histories actrocities in the constitution. What does an advisary body in the constitution have to do with recognition of historical actrocities in the constitution.

I understand your point, however I think it misses a key element. This land was owned and occupied by our first nations peoples for 65k years.

The British decided to take it over a few hundred years ago,, a pretty rough decision for first nations peoples. In fact they were only recognised as real people with a right to vote in 1967.

We can't reverse that bad decision now, each of us are now Australian. Yet no other group of peoples were the victim of our new country formation. Having recognition in the constitution, and a protected voice for national decisions that affect them seems reasonable.

No other group, culture, or religion has this relationship with our government. A voice for any other group wouldn't make sense. It's not a cultural voice - it's a political one for the nations we forced from power.

I understand that i just dont beleive i can moraly accept making any devision based on race whatsoever regardless of purpose or reason. I guess thats where we differ.

11 more...
11 more...
11 more...