A Supreme Court dispute over a $15,000 IRS bill may be aimed at a never-enacted tax on billionaires

MicroWave@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 354 points –
A Supreme Court dispute over a $15,000 IRS bill may be aimed at a never-enacted tax on billionaires
apnews.com

Charles and Kathleen Moore are about to have their day in the Supreme Court over a $15,000 tax bill they contend is unconstitutional.

The couple from Redmond, Washington, claim they had to pay the money because of their investment in an Indian company from which, as Charles Moore, 62, said in a sworn statement, they “have never received a distribution, dividend, or other payment.”

But significant parts of the story they have told to reach this point seem at odds with public records.

The Moores are the public face of a high court case backed by business and conservative political interests that could call into question other parts of the U.S. tax code and rule out a much-discussed but never-enacted tax on wealth. The case is set for arguments on Dec. 5.

42

You are viewing a single comment

Luckily the SCOTUS justices have no ties to the wealthy and are such excellent, impartial arbiters of blind justice.

I'm sure we all have full faith in them.

/s

My thoughts as well. I love the optimistic tone of the headline, but it isn't happening.

Welcome to US jurisprudence, where the rules are made up and the points precedent standing facts of the case don't matter!